Search Results

1. LCRO 117/2017 LA v KB (11 December 2019) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...consultant, says he was retained by the property companies. He says in June 2010, to preserve the property companies’ claim under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (WHRS Act) at his expense he lodged a claim under that Act. [5] In April 2009, the property companies granted general security agreements in favour of two companies in which Mr LA had interests.2 [6] During 2010, Mr LA approached Mr BAK, and two other lawyers for an estimate of legal costs for the...

2. Pook v Matchitt - Matangareka 3B Block [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 126 (2020 APPEAL 126) [pdf, 266 KB]

   2020 Māori Appellate Court 126 I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Waiariki District A20180005980 APPEAL 2018/13 A20180006063 APPEAL 2018/15 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Matangareka 3B Block I WAENGA I A Between TUIHANA POOK Kaipīra tuatahi First Appellant ME And RICHARD (JOHN) BUTLER, THOMAS

3. [2025] NZEmpC 152 Tillmans Fine Furniture Ltd v Rookes [pdf, 250 KB]

   TILLMANS FINE FURNITURE LIMITED v CINDY ROOKES [2025] NZEmpC 152 [22 July 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2025] NZEmpC 152 EMPC 361/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TILLMANS FINE FURNITURE LIMITED Plaintiff AND CINDY ROOKES Defendant Hearing: 13 May 2025 (Heard at Christchurch) Appea

4. [2011] NZEmpC 148 Service and Food Workers Union PSA v Pact Group [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...or on the employer's behalf. [4] The term ―essential service‖ is defined as being a service specified in Schedule 1 of the Act. 1 That schedule includes in Part A: 14 The operation of a residential welfare institution or prison. [5] The case for the plaintiffs is that the defendant is engaged in the operation of residential welfare institutions which, by definition, are essential services. Accordingly, the defendant may not lock out its employees without 14 days notice...

5. [2022] NZIACDT 16 GX v Registrar (5 July 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2022] NZIACDT 16 Reference No: IACDT 004/22 IN THE MATTER of an appeal against a decision of the Registrar under s 54 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY GZ Appellant AND THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 5 July 2022 REPRESENTATION: Appellant: Self-repr

6. Engelbrecht TRI-2020-100-007 Procedural Order 6 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...claims asserted against them are tenable, but weak. Often in litigation claims which appear weak at an early stage may gain momentum at trial, whereas other claims which appeared strong at the outset are later revealed to be fatally flawed. [45] It is necessary to be cautious when approaching applications under s 112 in order to prevent injustice to claimants who may in fact have a good claim once all the evidence is before the Tribunal, including thorough cross-examination in appro...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 154 100WPS Trustees Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 464 KB]

   ...affected by development cut and fill earthworks and include the issue of a Geotechnical Completion Report and Schedule 2A certificate covering all building platforms within the subdivision. The Schedule 2A certification shall include a statement under Clause 3(e) covering Section 106 of the Resource Management Act 1991. In the event the Schedule 2A http://www.drinkingwater.esr.cri.nz/mohlabs/labmain.asp 3 219367.0005 13890971.4 includes limitations or remedial works against a...

8. Proactive-release-20240715-CAB-Regulatory-Systems-Justice-Amendment-Bill_Final.pdf [pdf, 9.6 MB]

   I N C O N F I D E N C E 1 I N C O N F I D E N C E In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Office of the Associate Minister of Justice Cabinet Social Outcomes Committee Regulatory Systems (Justice) Amendment Bill Package: Policy Proposals Proposal 1 We seek agreement to amend legislation that impacts the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry’s) regulatory systems through a package of four associated bills: 1.1 the Regulatory Systems (Courts Improvement) Amendment Bi

9. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Hong [2020] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 265 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZLCDT 5 LCDT 016/19 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 5 Applicant AND BOON GUNN HONG Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall (retired) MEMBERS Ms J Gray Mr G McKenzie Prof D Scott Ms S Stuart DATE OF HEARING 12 and 13 December 2019 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE OF DECISION 10 Febr

10. CAC402 v Dunham [2016] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...of the husband complainant and is a builder of more than 40 years experience. [40] He said that on 30 August 2013 his son telephoned him to say that the son and his wife had purchased 42 Forrester Drive, Tauranga, subject a building certification clause and they wished him to attend the property to conduct a building inspection the next day. Accordingly, he met his son and daughter-in-law at the property on 31 August 2013, and the licensee also attended. [41] He said that during the...