Search Results

1. Khan v Khetarpal [2016] NZIACDT 6 (22 January 2016) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...January 2016 2 DECISION Background [1] This is one of three complaints the Tribunal upheld against Ms Khetarpal, the respective grounds for the complaints the Tribunal upheld were: [1.1] In this complaint Khan v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 45 (IACDT 033/14) the Tribunal upheld the complaint on the basis Ms Khetarpal lodged a defective application through lack of care and professionalism, and failed to properly adviser her client in the course of that process. [1.2] I...

2. J v Khetarpal [2016] NZIACDT 7 (22 January 2016) [pdf, 243 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT 7 Reference No: IACDT 005/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN O J Complainant AND Apurva Khetarpal Adviser No information identifying the complainant is to be published. DECISION (IMPOSING SANCT

3. Wellington Standards Committee v Hirschfeld [2014] NZLCDT 48 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...CHARL BENNO HIRSCHFELD of Auckland, Barrister CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Ms J Gray Mr K Raureti Mr P Shaw HEARING at Auckland DATE OF HEARING 23 and 28 July 2014 DATE OF DECISION 15 August 2014 APPEARANCES Mr C Gudsell QC and Ms C Paterson for the Standards Committee Mr R Harrison QC for the Practitioner 2 DECISION OF NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL (Decision as to...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 151 Carr, Labour Inspector v Sharma [pdf, 204 KB]

   DARREN BRETT CARR, LABOUR INSPECTOR v VISHAAL KUMAR SHARMA NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 151 [17 November 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 151 EMPC 138/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a charging document issued under Employment Relations Act 2000, s 235(1) BETWEEN DARREN BRETT CARR, LABOUR INSPECTOR Prosecutor AND VISHAAL KUMAR SHARMA Defendant Hearing: 14 September 2016 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: S

5. LCRO 143/2017 AC v BT (19 February 2019) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...of the respondent, Ms BT, at the relevant time a lawyer employed by [Law Firm], [Town] (the firm). [2] Ms AC, and her husband Mr CN, were married in January 2007. [3] In July 2008 they incorporated [Company] (the company) in which Mr CN held 85 per cent of the shares, and Ms AC held 15 per cent. [4] Later that year the company purchased a residential property at [Address 1] for $330,000 assisted by a bank loan of $340,000 (the [Address 1] loan) secured by mortgage over [Address 1]...

6. Supplementary advice on proposed Criminal Cases Review Commission model - Redacted [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...undertaken further analysis on a range of important issues, including the test for referring suspected miscarriages of justice to the courts, the CCRC’s powers to obtain information, and whether the CCRC should have an own-motion inquiry power. 5. The design of the CCRC is complex and the issues can be resolved in different ways. However, we think the advice below helps to strike a balance between the different views put forward during consultation, and will contribute to establishing...

7. Kapua - Succession to Paora te Hiko [2022] Chief Judge's MB 645 (2022 CJ 645) [pdf, 450 KB]

   2022 Chief Judge's MB 645 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District A20140009320 CJ 2014/24 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Paora te Hiko also known as Ngamotu Paora or Te Koti Paora NĀ By IVY WAITANGI KAPUA Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 14 May 2019, 2019 Chief Judg

8. LCRO 8/2022 QQ v LW (8 October 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 125 Ref: LCRO 8/2022B CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN QQ Applicant AND LW Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr QQ has applied for a rev

9. ENVC Matiatia expert witness planning 2014 [pdf, 700 KB]

   ...on 29th day of August 2014 and reconvened on 1st day of September 2014. 4. Participants were: • Nicole Bremner (NB) (for Auckland Council) • Max Dunn (MD) (for Waiheke Marinas Ltd) • Dave Serjeant (OS) (for Direction Matiatia Inc.) 5. In preparing this statement, the experts have read and understood the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses as Included in the Environment Court of New Zealand Practice Note 2011. 6. Description of the Site and Project The experts adopted th...

10. BW v DJ LCRO 9 / 2013 (20 September 2013) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...review. [47] What can be said in this review is that serving Termination Notices early would have reduced or limited BW’s exposure. DJ had the opportunity to review the indemnity document and find out whether it contained any ‘get out’ clause before emailing her advice to BW on 8 May 2012. In all the circumstances, it was incumbent upon DJ to have taken that step, and her failure to do so falls short of the standard of competence and diligence that a member of the public i...