Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - District 12 Wellington District [pdf, 13 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 12 WELLINGTON DISTRICT: PORT NICHOLSON, HUTT VALLEY, PORIRUA, RANGITIKEI, AND MANAWATU DR ROBYN ANDERSON AND KEITH PICKENS AUGUST 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh

2. Baker v Hemana - Tataraakina C (2020) 87 Takitimu MB 100 (87 TKT 100) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...Tataraakina C. As the Applicant has acknowledged, the Trustee has the authority in terms of the Trust Deed to authorise the 1080 drop. This matter was considered in both the 2004 and 2009 decisions of this Court. [42] In 2004, the Court found that a clause in the Trust Order gave the Trustees authority to deal with the land as if they were the absolute owners and that the Ngā Whenua Rāhui Kawenata did not prohibit the distribution of 1080 on the land. The Court therefore held the...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 090 Saville v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   ...declaration; (b) declines the application for cross-declaration. B: Pursuant to s 313(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991 the Environment Court declares the airport (helipad) at 704 Malaghans Road, Wakatipu Basin, is not exempted from rule 5.3.3.3(v) of the Operative District Plan or from the standard in Chapter 24: Wakatipu Basin, rule 24.5.18 of the proposed District Plan. Savi lle v Queenslown Lakes District Counci l - Declaration Decision 2 C: Costs are reserved. Any...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 237 Gate Gourmet NZ Ltd and ors v Sandhu and Ors [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...action in relation to employees and their terms and conditions of employment and had failed to properly consult with AWU about the proposed changes. Second, the defendants claimed Gate had acted unlawfully in paying them below the minimum wage of $756 per week. The defendants sought penalties against both plaintiffs. [4] The Authority Member said that, although he recognised that there was a difference of view about whether or not AWU, on behalf of its members, agreed to

5. McKenzie v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2024] NZACC 008 [pdf, 295 KB]

   ................................. [9] Review ........................................................................................................... [40] Post-Review Evidence ................................................................................... [45] Appellant’s submissions ...................................................................................... [55] The Corporation’s Submissions .............................................................................

6. EMPC Old dogs new tricks conference presentation [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...judicial traction afforded concepts of good faith bargaining under the previous Employment Contracts Act regime. The legislation was introduced by a Labour-led coalition government to encourage collective bargaining and recognise the role of unions. 5 Good faith was intended to underpin all aspects of employment relations under the 2000 Act but, in particular, collective bargaining for collective agreements. Only registered unions of employees may participate in collective bargai...

7. Sherburn v CAC 10017 & Harlows [2012] NZREADT 33 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...First respondent/prosecutor AND ROY HARLOW AND NANCY HARLOW Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms J Robson - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member HEARD at AUCKLAND on 9 May 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 15 June 2012 COUNSEL Mr E Hudson for appellant Mr S Wimsett for first respondent No appearance by or on behalf of second respondent (on this threshold issue) DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ON THRESHOLD ISSUE OF JURISDICTION The Issue

8. [2017] NZEnvC 181 Titirangi Protection Group Inc and Ors v Watercare Services Limited and Auckland Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...First Applicant K BERMAN & ORS Second Applicants D & J HUTCHINGS Third Applicants (ENV-2017-AKL-121 ) WATERCARE SERVICES LIMITED First Respondent AUCKLAND COUNCIL Second Respondent Environment Judge JA Smith At Auckland on 25 October 2017 DA Cowan for Titirangi Protection Group Inc and D & J Holdings (the Protection Group) KW Berman for second applicants WS Loutit & SJ Mitchell for Auckland Council (the Council) and Watercare Services Limited (Waterca...

9. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

   ...Authority AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to objection to disclosure AND BETWEEN KAIKORAI SERVICE CENTRE LIMITED Plaintiff AND FIRST UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed 20 & 25 June 2018 Appearances: T Oldfield, counsel for the plaintiff P Cranney, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 23 July 2018 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH DISCLOSURE [1] In the...

10. Godfrey v Harvey [2019] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 434 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr G Robins and Ms J Emmerson for plaintiff Mr P Drummond and Ms R Oakley for defendants DATE OF HEARING: 24, 25 and 26 September 2018 DATE OF DECISION: 22 January 2019 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Mr and Mrs Harvey own several rental properties in Palmerston North. In October 2015, they advertised one of these properties to rent. Ol...