Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 239 Nelson-Marlborough Fish & Game Council v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 239 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN NELSON-MARLBOROUGH FISH AND GAME COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-35) … (continued on separate page) Appellants AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 2 November 2023 __...

2. Needham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover for Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss) [2024] NZACC 133 (5 August 2024) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...audiometer used in the tests. (d) The date of the last basic calibration of the audiometer and the name of the laboratory that conducted the calibration. (e) The age of the claimant and whether an adjustment has been made for presbycusis (Pursuant to clause 5 of the Regulations); and (f) Any other comments relevant to the assessment. [42] The Regulations detail the procedure that audiologists and otolaryngologists must follow when conducting audiograms. The Regulations do no...

3. Monschau v Bamber - Tahorakuri A No 1 Section 33A2 [2016] Maori Appellate Court MB 286 (2016 APPEAL 286) [pdf, 264 KB]

   2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 286 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20150005958 APPEAL 2015/19 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF TAHORAKURI A NO 1 SECTION 33A2 AHU WHENUA TRUST - an appeal against a reserved judgment at 125 Waiariki MB 260-266 on 13 August 2015 BETWEEN SHANE MONSCHAU AND HARRY TE NGARU Appellants AND BRUCE BAMBER AND KATHLEEN BAMBER Respondents Hearin

4. Ringwood v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 44 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...builder or a developer continues up until sale. In the present case, the first sale of the house occurred some 15 months after building work was complete. [68] The claimant and the first respondent have placed reliance on the vendors warranty at clause 6.2(5)(d) of the August 2000 sale and purchase agreement between the Urlichs and the first purchasers. Effectively this is a warranty that building work done or permitted to be done by the vendor complies with the Building Code....

5. AR v ZE LCRO 83/2012 (6 May 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...summarised by the Committee as follows: (a) That she [Ms ZE] had deducted fees from monies held in trust without authority. (b) That her fees exceeded the quote he was given at the outset. (c) The manner in which the conveyancing matter was handled. [5] The effect of the judgment was that I must approach Mr and Mrs AR’s application for review of the determination of the Standards Committee afresh. The parties [6] The Standards Committee processed the complaint as being a compl...

6. Waipa-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...___________________________________________________________ FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000084) HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL (ENV-2020-AKL-000091) IWI OF HAURAKI (ENV-2020-AKL-000088) MERCURY NZ LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000095) OJI FIBRE SOLUTIONS (NZ) LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000083) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NZ INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-AKL-000094) SOUTH WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2020-AKL-000092) TAUPO DISTRICT COU...

7. [2020] NZIACDT 54 - DY v Parker (21 December 2020) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...properly engaged an expert to prepare the business plan and, giving him the benefit of the doubt, controlled the preparation of the plan within his overall control of the immigration process. But he excused himself wholly from the client 23 Clause 26(c) of the Code. 24 At [95] herein. 20 relationship. He did not unlawfully abandon the task of producing that document and the forms (in terms of his obligation under cl 3(c)), but he did abandon his client. Indeed, he never e...

8. [2020] NZEnvC 159 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 159 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on the attached Schedule) Appellants

9. [2020] NZEnvC 001 Environmental Defence Society v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Property Owners' Alliance Inc 13 January 2020 1 4 JAN,2020 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A The Thames Coromandel District Council is directed to amend its proposed District Plan by altering the Coastal Environment Line on the property at 500 Boat Harbour Road, Whenuakite, as shown in Attachment 8 to the supplementary statement of evidence of Stephen Brown dated 2 April 2019 and presented to the hearing before the Court on 3 April 2019. B. In all other respects the re...

10. Anderson v Lowe - Succession to Moera Anderson [2021] Chief Judge's MB 728 (2021 CJ 728) [pdf, 499 KB]

    2021 Chief Judge’s MB 728 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District A20180001330 CJ 2018/2 WĀHANGA Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Under MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of CJ 2018/2 - Moera Anderson and a succession order made at 339 Aotea MB 81- 85 on 14 July 2015 - Application to the Chief Judge I WAENGA I A LORRAINE ANDERSON Betw