Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 187 Calcutta Farms Limited v Matamata-Piako District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...single stage full District Plan Review. It is specifically designed to address the planning controls and the extent of zoning for Matamata, Morrinsville and Te Aroha in relation to the provision of housing, new business and industrial activities. [5] Section 79 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) requires a territorial authority to conduct 10 yearly reviews of its District Plan provisions. Sections 79(1) and (2) enable the review of part of a plan. For such a partial review s...

2. OWRUG - EiC - S H McKeague - Agriculture (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1022 KB]

   PP-1035600-2-216-V3 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV:2020-CHC-127 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago. Between OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant And OTAGO WATER RESOURCE USER GROUP Section 274 Party EVIDENCE OF SUSAN HELEN MCKEAGUE FOR OTAGO WATER RESOURCE USER GROUP GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN

3. 2021-10-22 ORC PC7 - [2021] NZEnvC 164 - Interim Decision [pdf, 1 MB]

   OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL – PLAN CHANGE 7 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 164 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under s 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127)

4. [2023] NZEnvC 058 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   QTN PDP – TOPIC 18 UCESI v QLDC - DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 58 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED AND OTHERS (ENV-2018-CHC-56) (and all the appellants allocated to Topic 18) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court:

5. Regulatory Impact Statement Considering changing the New Zealand flag [pdf, 8 MB]

   ...Minister, Rt Hon John Key, announced in March 2014 that, if re­ elected at the 2014 General Election, his Government would hold a public discussion and a vote on New Zealand's flag . Following the election, he indicated this would happen during 2015. 2. Legislation is required to enable any referendums and to provide for consequential amendments following the result. A change in the flag will require amendment of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981 (FENPA) . The New...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 042 Baldock v Auckland Council Community Facilities [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...and I will generally refer to the consent authority as the Council and the consent holder as Community Facilities, as the parties did. Where I am unsure or where the difference is immaterial, I will simply refer to the Council. Background [5] The background facts in this section of the decision are taken from the descriptions in the original decision of the Council's independent hearing commissioners. Ms Manning was counsel for the Society and Ms Baldock on that appeal. She i...

7. LCRO 78/2017 UT v HB (26 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...his estate to Ms UT’s mother (the 1989 will). 2 [4] Ms UT’s mother died in 2001. In October 2001, Mr HB prepared another will for Mr JWS in which Mr JWS left his estate to his mother who lived in the Netherlands (the 2001 will). [5] On 27 November 2009, Mr JWS telephoned Mr HB with instructions to complete a new will in which he proposed leaving his estate to Ms UT, with a substituted gift to Ms UT’s daughters if Ms UT predeceased Mr JWS. Mr HB wrote to Mr JWS on 2 D...

8. [2020] NZREADT 31 – Turoa v Real Estate Agents Authority (30 July 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...[2020] NZREADT 31 READT 031/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN EWEN TUROA and OSBORNE REALTY LIMITED Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 519) First Respondent AND JANNA GILLIGAN and ROBERT MILLS Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions filed...

9. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Respondent AND No Tenth Respondent AND TIMOTHY TERRENCE MANNING Eleventh Respondent AND BRUCE CHRISTIAN Twelfth Respondent AND No Thirteenth Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATOR (Dated 11th day of March 2005) Claim 00062 – Ponsonby Gardens Unit 7 page 2 of 117 INDEX TO DETERMINATION Section Headings Page 1 BACKGROUND 3 2 CHRONOLOGY 8 3 THE PARTIES 9 4 THE CLAIMS...

10. Advantage Realty Limited v CAC303 & Ors / Gambino & Anor v CAC303 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 83 [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...the consent form. [9] Mrs Elva Boyd offered $505,000 conditional on the sale of her home, a satisfactory builders’ report, and her solicitor’s approval of the title and the form and content of the agreement. The agreement included an escape clause for the complainants whereby, if they received a better offer, they could end the agreement by giving Mrs Boyd 10 working days’ notice. The complainants counter-offered at $565,000 and after some negotiations the parties agreed on $5...