Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 57 New Zealand Steel Ltd v Haddad [pdf, 444 KB]

   ...redeployment should your position become surplus. You will be treated fairly and reasonably in any selection process, taking into account such things as skills, experience and employment record. [47] As noted above, NZ Steel submitted that the clause does not oblige it to offer redeployment but only to consider redeployment. It accepts that such consideration must be fair and genuine. 6 Gafiatullina v Propellerhead Ltd [2021] NZEmpC 146, [2021] ERNZ 654 at [112] and [148]; and...

2. Waitangi Tribunal theme U - Land with All Woods and Waters [pdf, 1010 KB]

   Rangahaua Whanui National Theme u THE LAND WITH ALL WOODS AND WATERS WENDY POND May 1997 Unpublished Draft WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 5b: Gisborne, S Daly District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith Distri

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Terra Nova Planning Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   1 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2016-AKL- AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) AND IN THE MATTE

4. E v IAG New Zealand Ltd (3rd decision – quantum) [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 596 KB]

   ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Rates and measures ....................................................................................................................... 15 Retaining wall ................................................................................................................................... 17 Material supply delays and inflation .................................

5. [2024] NZEmpC 198 Fredricsen and anor v Air New Zealand Ltd and Air New Zealand Ltd v Fredricsen and anor [pdf, 305 KB]

   LEIF FREDRICSEN v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 198 [10 October 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 198 EMPC 5/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LEIF FREDRICSEN First Plaintiff AND WARREN LAWRENCE Second Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant EMPC 16/20

6. [2019] NZEnvC 195 Clevedon North Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   !BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA [2019] NZEnvC \ q 5 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s120 of the Act BETWEEN CLEVEDON NORTH LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-029) Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: 4 - 6 November 2019 Appearances: R E Bartlett QC for Clevedon North Limited S F Quinn for Auckland Council A Rennie for herself and J

7. [2023] NZEnvC 186 Lund v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...others on provisions in the proposed Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan (‘2GP’).1 The appeal concerns land owned by the trust and located in Abbotsford, a residential suburb of Dunedin (the site). The site comprises an area of 1.56ha and fronting on to North Taieri Road. [2] The front half of the site contains buildings with a floor area of approximately 4300 m². These buildings are set back from the road. To the rear is an open space area with an uphill gradient...

8. Paora - Te Tii Waitangi A (Waitangi Marae) (2015) 94 Taitokerau MB 134 (94 TTK 134) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120009644 UNDER Regulation 21, Māori Reservations Regulations 1994 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi A (Waitangi Marae) BETWEEN WAIRETI PAORA Applicant A20120011550 UNDER Sections 67, 239 and 338(7), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi A BETWEEN MEREHORA TAURUA Applicant Hearing: 24 January 2013 2 December 2013 14 January 2015...

9. Algie & Ors v ACC [2013] NZACA 1 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...to make payments under ss 121 and 80 because of s 149(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act. [36] There is no reference to ss 36 and 37; the rehabilitation provisions in the 1972 and 1982 Acts are replaced by s 79 of the 2001 Act, which itself is based on Clause 38 of Schedule 1 of the 1998 Act and adopts the 1992 Act rehabilitation objectives. Case for the appellants: Gratuitous attendant care under 1972 and 1982 Acts [37] Mr Miller advanced two basic arguments, the first focusing on the reh...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 154 TUV v WXY [pdf, 512 KB]

    ...rejected (although there is no Parliamentary 2 See Tannadyce Investments Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2011] NZSC 158, [2012] 2 NZLR 153 (SC) at [73]. See too the recent discussion of ouster clauses in Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [2018] NZEmpC 138 and 8i Corp v Marino [2017] NZEmpC 69 at [24]-[25]. 3 Note the provisions for minors under Part 6 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017. The Act allows the Court...