[2021] NZEmpC 186 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Gill [pdf, 349 KB]
...made by the Authority in Mr Gill’s favour. Mr Gill disputed the challenges, asserting in essence that the Authority had reached the correct conclusion as to liability, although it had erred as to the extent of remedies awarded. The facts [5] The core facts are not in issue since many of them involve email communications. The interpretation to be placed on some of these, however, is more controversial. Mr Gill’s employment by RBL [6] On 16 January 2017, Mr Gill was off...