Search Results

1. Moriori Claims Settlement bill [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...to those claims are in comparable circumstances to the recipients of the entitlements under the Bill. No differential treatment for the purpose of s 19 therefore arises by excluding others from the entitlements conferred under the Bill. Privative Clause 5. Clause 15 of the Bill provides that the settlement of the historical claims is final. It excludes the jurisdiction of the Courts, the Tribunal and other judicial bodies to inquire into the historical claims, the deed of settlement,...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 124  E Tū Inc v Mainland Poultry Ltd [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...a “shift” for the purposes of the collective agreement, and there is no dispute that they are permanent shift workers. The dispute squarely centers on the meaning of the phrase “alternating or rotating” for the purposes of cl 11. [7] Clause 9 of the collective agreement is headed “Hours of work”. It provides that: Clause 9 Hours of Work (a) The parties acknowledge that ordinary hours of work may vary 1 It is not clear on the evidence when these provisions w...

3. Nabi v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 21 (7 July 2011) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...with his immigration affairs, and financial dealings with the Adviser. [2] The Registrar has referred the complaint as a breach of the Code of Conduct, the Code having been developed pursuant to section 37 of the Act (published www.iaa.govt.nz). Clause 1 of the Code sets out the requirements for commencing a professional engagement, clause 2 has the obligations to ensure a client maintains lawful status in New Zealand, clause 3 requires an adviser to report to clients, clause 8 requires...

4. S v Xue [2015] NZIACDT 58 (15 May 2015) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...see www.justice.govt.nz). [2] The Tribunal determined the following complaints: [2.1] Ms Xue was responsible for an advertisement that disclosed confidential information relating to the complainants. That potentially breached her obligations in clause 1.2 of the Code of Conduct. [2.2] The same advertisement, represented as a true account, contained false and exaggerated information to promote her practice. That potentially breached her obligations in clause 5.1 of the Code of Conduct....

5. BORA Land Transport (Speed Limits Validation) Bill [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...limits); • protect enforcement action taken in relation to speed limits from any doubt concerning the validity of the speed limits; and • provide clear authority for the setting of speed limits by road controlling authorities in the future. 4. Clause 6(1) of the Bill provides every specified bylaw purportedly in force is valid and declared to be and always to have been lawfully made, even if: • the enactment or enactments under which the bylaw was purported to be made did not...

6. Bratton v Le Lievre - Muriwhenua Incorporation [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 131 (2017 APPEAL 131) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...authorised in terms of s 150B(1)(b) are by law limited to a maximum of 52 years. That is, the effect of s 150B(1)(b) is to put a 52 year cap on any such LTOs. [22] Before us Mr Kahukiwa argued that the finding that the wording of cl 14 (the renewal clause) of the LTO was not yet certain and his interpretation as against s 150B(1)(b) of the Act are incorrect. Counsel maintains that the LTO comes within the definition of long- 12 Ib...

7. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AT evidence chief legal submissions suppl [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...provision is made in the bylaw for exemptions in relation to special vehicle lanes. 3 However, resolutions made under the bylaw may be expressed as applying at any specified time or period of time.4 As a result, Auckland Transport could: 1 Clause 10(1), see also Clause 5(1) 2 Clause 5(1) 3 Compare Clause 11(3) in relation to restrictions for unsuitability 4 Clause 6(a) 4932196.1 2 a Prescribe the 'keyhole' area as a special vehicle lane, restricted to ferry...

8. Talanoa v Tangilanu [2015] NZIACDT 63 (19 May 2015) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...DECISION This Complaint [1] This decision imposes sanctions, following a decision upholding a complaint against Ms Tangilanu (Talanoa v Tangilanu [2015] NZIACDT 40; see www.justice.govt.nz). [2] The complaints were: [2.1] That Ms Tangilanu breached clause 1.5(a), (b) and (d) of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code). Those provisions required Ms Tangilanu to have written terms of engagement, explain all relevant matters, and have her clients confirm i...

9. IX v SC LCRO 226 / 2010 (13 March 2012) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...[4] Mr SC prepared a draft lease which reflected the terms agreed on, and after approval by his client, the document was sent on 16 December 2009 to ADH who acted for ADG. The company took possession of the premises over the Christmas break. [5] Following enquiry of ADH as to when the lease would be signed, that firm sent a letter to Mr SC in which amendments to the draft lease were requested. Significant correspondence then ensued between Mr SC and ADH and after some amendments...

10. [2006] NZEmpC WC 27/06 ANZ National Bank v Cortright [pdf, 67 KB]

    ...the view that Mr Cortright’s position was not covered by the collective agreement and that it had no obligation to offer the agreement to him. [4] Finsec and Mr Cortright are in dispute with the bank about the interpretation of the coverage clause of the collective agreement. Finsec asked the Employment Relations Authority to enforce it. The Authority’s determination [5] Counsel advised that the case before the Court was in very similar terms to that presented to the Auth...