Search Results

1. Drever v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 207 [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...the IRD and/or the Corporation are beyond the jurisdiction of this Court in deciding on Mr Drever’s appeal, which is confined to the correctness of the Reviewer’s decision regarding his claim to weekly compensation. 3 Section 15(2) and clauses 30-31 of Schedule 1. 4 Clause 32(1) of Schedule 1. 5 Section 15(2)(a). 6 Nicholas, above note 1, at [25]. 9 Conclusion [31] In light of the above considerations, the Court finds that the Corporation’s decision of 23 Augus...

2. BORA Customs and Excise Bill [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...intended journey). The individual faces consequences for a failure to provide the required information. For example, cl 308 provides that failing to answer a Customs officer’s question may result, on conviction, in a fine not exceeding $5,000. 13. Clauses 195 and 196 of the Bill prohibit the use of electronic communication devices in Customs places or Customs-controlled areas, if there is a sign prohibiting the use of such devices. A Customs officer must also require a person not to u...

3. Samuelu v Aasa [2014] NZIACDT 67 (30 May 2014) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...that intention from the outset. [8.4] She breached the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the Code), as she: [8.4.1] Failed to prepare, lodge and pursue the complainant’s application with due care, diligence and professionalism (clause 1 of the Code of Conduct). [8.4.2] She failed to communicate with her client as required by clause 3 of the Code of Conduct. [8.4.3] Provided no services of value so was required to refund fees in full and failed to do so (clauses 8...

4. KQ & WQ v EN & MN [2021] NZDT 1439 (27 April 2021) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EN and MN wanted to subdivide their property and sell two sections. KQ and WQ entered a contract with EN and MN to purchase a section, subject to subdivision. The agreement had a sunset clause that allowed EN and MN to cancel the agreement if title had not been obtained by a certain date. Prior to settlement, KQ and WQ spent money clearing an area of trees on the property where a driveway was to be constructed. They say they...

5. Lam-Po-Tang v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 153 (30 September 2024) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...Wellington/Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: T Clark Murphy for the Appellant K Anderson for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 30 September 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Impairment assessment – clause 54, Schedule 1, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 25 August 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of t...

6. Lam-Po-Tang v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 153 (30 September 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Wellington/Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: T Clark Murphy for the Appellant K Anderson for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 30 September 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Impairment assessment – clause 54, Schedule 1, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 25 August 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of t...

7. Maserow v CAC404 & Ors [2016] NZREADT 19 [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...demolished. He said that he had drawn this to the attention of Mr Kumar. Mr Kumar denied this and said that the access to the carport was very important to him. This seems to have been borne out by the agreement for sale and purchase which included a clause 19 which provided as follows: “The purchaser could open the fence for entry to back carport at purchaser cost up to owner agreed distance on the existing fence.” [6] The Tribunal is not certain that the fence was ever opened...

8. BORA End of Life Choices Bill section 7 report [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...mind at any time 11.5 encourage the person to talk about his or her wish with others, such as family, friends, and counsellors, and ensure that the person has had the opportunity to do so 4 Clause 4. 5 Clause 8. 3 11.6 ensure that person knows that he or she is not obliged to talk to anyone, and 11.7 do his or her best to ensure that the person expresses his or her wish free from pressure from any other person by tal...

9. BORA Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...entitlements conferred by the Bill is not differential treatment for the purposes of s 19. 4. To the extent that s 19 might be engaged, any infringement is justified by the objective of ensuring that related claimant groups are not prejudiced by the Clause 13(1) defines Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki, cl 14 defines historical claims. Level 3 Justice Centre 19 Aitken Street PO Box 2858 DX SP20208 Wellington 6140 New Zealand Ph: +64 4 472 1719 Fax: +64 4 473 3482 4118599_1 www.crownlaw.govt.nz...

10. FB v TT Ltd [2022] NZDT 201 (17 July 2022) [pdf, 156 KB]

    Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 201 APPLICANT FB RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: TT Ltd is to pay $5,520.00 to FB by 10 August 2022. Reasons: 1. This order should be read with that dated 24/2/22. What were the relevant terms of the contract the parties entered into: both the written terms and the implied terms? Was the quote to be valid indefinitely