5992 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 46 Reference No: IACDT 029/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Manit Ly Complainant AND Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person. Complainant
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2014-100-000036 [2016] NZWHT AUCKLAND 5 BETWEEN JANET WILSON STARIK AND GEORGE ANDREW DEEB AS TRUSTEES OF THE HERBERT STARIK FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND PENINSULA HOMES LIMITED Second Respondent AND KEVIN BRYAN PERRY Third Respondent AND SCOTT DAVID PERRY Fourth Respondent AND GARY MURTAGH Fifth Respondent AND JAMES HARDIE NEW ZEALAND Sixth Respondent Hearing: 2–5, 12
...the doctor. [8] The defendant was employed as a “locum coordinator”. Her role was to receive requests from a particular group of hospitals and to match a doctor to each request. [9] The parties had a written employment agreement, two clauses of which were: 17. Restraint of Trade and Non-Solicitation 17.1 The employee acknowledges that whilst performing his/her duties hereunder, he/she will be privy to confidential information and trade secrets belonging and...
..."gift" any hospitality or goods and services of any kind including future jobs What use is a document that does not do these things? It only makes a mockery of our parliament and our democracy.This is shocking. Especially as the last point, clause 17. is "exercise accountability" and yet there is none. We have no accountability. This bill is nothing but hot air. Hot air that fails even these very important steps to protect our democracy: 1) Public disclosure of lo...
...at www.iaa.govt.nz/code/code-conduct-2010.pdf) was developed pursuant to section 37 of the Act. The Code applied to Mr Hakaoro, and contains the conventional contemporary obligations on a professional person providing services to the public. The clauses of the Code which are relevant to the current complaint require that: 5 [33.1.1] A licensed immigration adviser must ensure that before any agreement is entered into, clients are made aware, in writing and in plain languag...
...his fiancée. [2] Mr HNL paid $920 for that service. However, the matter had not gone very far when Mr HNL told Mr SEC he did not want him to do any more work. [3] The dispute is primarily over Mr SEC agreeing to refund some money, but treating $576 as non-refundable. [4] In addition, Mr HNL complains that Mr SEC over-sold his fiancée’s immigration prospects. [5] The complaint has been upheld on the basis that a refund of the whole fee was required, as Mr SEC drafted a contingen...
...have obtained the information from Immigration New Zealand on request; he negligently failed to inquire into the complainant’s immigration history. 3 [6.1.3] The Registrar noted as an alternative that the conduct potentially breached clauses 1.1(a) and 2.2 of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code). [6.2] That Mr Hakaoro breached clause 1.5(b) of the 2010 Code in relation to the written agreement not containing a description of the immigrat...
...of employment agreement used by most businesses today. It is an agreement between employees and the company setting out the terms and conditions of employment and it identifies the expectations of both parties in the employment relationship. Clauses in the employment agreement outline matters such as, hours of work, holidays, sick and bereavement leave, pay, confidentiality, intellectual property and when employment ends. For Cadmus employees, the introduction of a redundancy com...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2017-AKL- 000093 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of appeals under Clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN Balance Agri-Nutrients Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991...
...The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Vehicles driven by ST and SC on a race-track at the [Race] in [Town] in November 2022 were involved in a collision. 2. ST alleges that SC was driving negligently and claims $5,230.00 from him made up as follows: a. Cost of repairs to ST’s vehicle $ 5,048.50 b. Reimbursement of Tribunal filing fee $ 180.00 c. Rounding $ 1.50 $ 5,230.00 3. The issues to be resolved are: a. Does claus