Search Results

Search results for consumer consequential.

428 items matching your search terms

  1. [2018] NZEmpC 111 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 256 KB]

    ...relation to the application for costs in the Court; (c) he raises issues about claimed disbursements; and 1 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [2018] NZEmpC 79. (d) he disagrees with the “consequential” claims advanced (being for interest sought on the costs judgment sum, and costs associated with the costs application). Costs payable in relation to the Authority [3] Clause 15 of sch 2 of the Employment Relations...

  2. Central Standards Committee 3 v Bong [2023] NZLCDT 24 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...with misconduct.1 Alternatives pleaded were negligence2 or unsatisfactory conduct. The latter was admitted by Mr Bong. [2] This decision gives our reasons for finding liability at the level of unsatisfactory conduct and makes penalty orders consequential on that finding. Brief factual background [3] Mr Bong acted for Ms W on the sale of a business which she told him she was operating on her own.3 Ms W also owned the property from which the business was operated in her sole...

  3. Barfoot & Thompson v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 51 KB]

    ...example, where a separate licensee is not required to act as an intermediary negotiator between the client and the licensee purchaser. However, it is submitted for the Authority that the Committee was correct to find that, in cases involving most consumer clients, steps of that kind will be required in the interests of fairness to protect the client and to avoid the perception of conflict of interest. Mr Hodge adds that Barfoot & Thompson’s policy does not provide for such measure...

  4. OWRUG Updated Supplementary S Dicey Planning 24 March 2021 [pdf, 789 KB]

    ...is a lack of clarity about what evidence might be required or accepted to show that irrigation areas have not expanded. For larger schemes, which can cover thousands of hectares and have hundreds of shareholders, this would be complex and time consuming. As such it does not serve the process based purpose of PC7. 3 PP-1035600-2-391-V1 12. In addition, the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Freshwater) Regulations 2020 effectively manages expansion...

  5. Waratah Trust v CAC 20004 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 20 [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...sub-subsection was considered in Quin v REAA [2012] NZHC 3557 where, at [44], the High Court (per Brewer J) summarised the purpose of the 2008 Act as “... the regulation of the real estate industry so as to promote and protect the interest of the consumers. This includes conferring on regulators powers to grant consumers relief from harm, resulting from licensees acting contrary to the standards required of them”. Justice Brewer further held that: “[58] In my view, the wording o...

  6. LCRO 193/2017 AA v BB and CC (29 November 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...Firm] partnership on 31 December 2018 and was now practising as a barrister. He confirmed that Ms CC represented [NUA] as junior counsel from July 2015 to early October 2017. Ms CC’s involvement with the [NUA] file ended in October 2017, consequential upon resigning her employment position with [Law Firm]. [53] In response to the submissions, Mr BB submitted that: (a) Subsequent to Mr AA filing submissions with the LCRO in November 2017, there have been nine judgments delivere...

  7. IncreasingRevenuefromCourtsandTribunalFeesandCollectionsServices.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...collection services Proposal 1 This paper seeks agreement to a package of proposals that support the effective provision of Courts and Tribunal services. 2 The proposals will increase revenue collected from Courts and Tribunals, including: 2.1 a Consumers Price Index (CPI) inflation adjustment to fees in a range of Tribunals, the Civil District and High Courts, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court, with effect from 1 July 2024, 2.2 a 10 percent increase to fees in the Criminal Dis...

  8. Disputes Tribunal Annual Report for 12 months to 31 December 2024 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ANNUAL REPORT DISPUTES TRIBUNAL TE RANGA WHAKAWĀ TAUTOHE For the year ended 31 December 2024 Published 29 August 2025 This material can be copied, distributed, and adapted without seeking permission if it is attributed. Please contact disputestribunal@justice.govt.nz if you have any questions about this report or the use of any material from the report. mailto:disputestribunal@justice.govt.nz 1 Contents Foreword 2

  9. DX v KD & I Ltd [2025] NZDT 77 (19 February 2025) [pdf, 207 KB]

    ...willing to settle for an amount of $12,500 plus 10% interest as per the invoice of $1250 plus court costs and transport costs of the cabin. 7. This is a claim in contract. There has been no issue raised by DX that the sale was in trade to her as a consumer so I will resolve the claim applying the common law of contract which in New Zealand is overlaid by the terms of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, the CCLA where appropriate. 8. The issues to be decided then are whether...

  10. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 556 KB]

    ...supports the relief sought in relation to clause 5.a (deletion of 5.a). Federated Farmers supports in part the relief sought in relation to paragraph 5.b however, considers reference to LUC 7 and 8 should also be deleted from clause 5.b and consequential relief sought by the Federated Farmers appeal. Un-grazed Vegetated Buffer Federated Farmers considers the setback in paragraph 5c is too restrictive and ought to be no more than 5m (which was the standard in the draft NES pr...