Search Results

1. OIA-119289.pdf [pdf, 20 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 3 April 2025 Our ref: OIA 119289 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: s228, s229A, and s240 of the Crimes Act 1961 Thank you for your email and attached letter of 10 February 2025, requesting information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), relating to s228, s229A, and s240 of the Crimes Act 1961. Specifically, you requested

2. Director of Proceedings v Smith (Application for Final Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 695 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE DEFENDANT. (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 32 Reference No. HRRT 092/2016 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND MRS SMITH DEFENDANT AT

3. Lee v Whangarei District Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...interest and costs. She seeks the same amount for remedial work from each respondent. Judge Sharp recorded that Ms Lee had been advised that her home needs to be fully re- clad at a cost of $601,096.75. Ms Lee sought $422,769.93 of that, plus consequential losses of $49,051.16 and general damages of $30,000 from CCS. (The amount of her counterclaim was also reported in the Court of Appeal judgment as $557,000.) Mr Beresford has submitted that the difference between $601,096, the am...

4. JG v RS LCRO 245 / 2010 (15 March 2012) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...themselves of the cost revision process has been narrowed. [35] The purposes of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act is set out in section 3 of the Act. They include to maintain public confidence in the provision of legal services and to protect the consumers of legal services. There are in my view good policy grounds that the current section 132(2) should not be interpreted narrowly.” [41] For this reason, Judge Cunningham therefore considered that Ms RS was a “party charg...

5. LCRO 240/2017 O & B HN v JJ Lawyers (22 June 2018) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...the manner in which Mr FT was allowed to use the room — that being to permit its occupancy and business use without any effort to establish and maintain due separation — had the capacity to mislead members of the public as actual or potential consumers of legal services. [74] On the facts before me separate office space was not maintained by any means that proclaimed that the businesses were separate and distinct. So, the public at large were in jeopardy of being led to believe...

6. Proactive-release-20240715-CAB-Regulatory-Systems-Justice-Amendment-Bill_Final.pdf [pdf, 9.6 MB]

   ...remuneration of the board members from the Cabinet Fee Framework to the Remuneration Authority (proposal 2.5 in Appendix Two). Regulatory Systems (Occupational Regulation) Amendment Bill: Strengthening occupational regulatory bodies and reducing burden to consumers 28 Occupational regulation aims to ensure that regulated services are performed with reasonable care and skill. This protects consumers and the public from harm resulting from services being provided incompetently or reck...

7. Tom De Pelsemaeker - Evidence in Reply (25 June 2021) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA BET

8. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

   IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 041/2018 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuv

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000201 Progressive Enterprises Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...seeks that the minimum parking rates for retail and commercial services in the Metropolitan Centre, Town Centre, Local Centre and Mixed Use zones in the Panel's Recommendation be included in the Unitary Plan. 21. Progressive also seeks such consequential or related relief as may be necessary to give effect to its concerns. Service 22. An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. Waivers and dire...

10. Trustees Executors Ltd as trustee for the Simpson Family Trust v Wellington City Council [pdf, 124 KB]

    ...that the claim was now the amount reported as the cost of repairs by the assessor, namely $83,437.00. [78] On 21 February the claimant then added a sum of $84,896.00 to the claim for ‘full repair costs’, $80,000.00 for diminution in value, consequential losses of $24,080.87 and remedial work of $55,455.83. [79] Later on 21 February 2008 the claimant adjusted its claim to $168,333.00. The Damage [80] The experts appointed by the parties met and agreed to the follow...