428 items matching your search terms
IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 041/2018 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuv
...seeks that the minimum parking rates for retail and commercial services in the Metropolitan Centre, Town Centre, Local Centre and Mixed Use zones in the Panel's Recommendation be included in the Unitary Plan. 21. Progressive also seeks such consequential or related relief as may be necessary to give effect to its concerns. Service 22. An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. Waivers and dire...
...that the claim was now the amount reported as the cost of repairs by the assessor, namely $83,437.00. [78] On 21 February the claimant then added a sum of $84,896.00 to the claim for ‘full repair costs’, $80,000.00 for diminution in value, consequential losses of $24,080.87 and remedial work of $55,455.83. [79] Later on 21 February 2008 the claimant adjusted its claim to $168,333.00. The Damage [80] The experts appointed by the parties met and agreed to the follow...
...– the practitioner is suffering significant depression, not just as a result of these proceedings, but because of the collapse and loss of so many other important things in her life. As a consequence she is at risk of further deterioration and consequential significant risk to her well-being, if her name is published. That is the firm view of the specialist psychiatrist who has provided a number of unsworn reports for production by the practitioner which were admitted with the c...
...a general concession by IAG that the floor is currently out of level and does not meet the policy standard. [60] Although my analysis is subject to the caveat that it is not reasonably practicable to raise the floor to a level which causes consequential damage to other areas of the house, which in this case includes any element which has pre-existing settlement “locked” into it, my own analysis of the pile locations indicates that consequential damage is less likely than the...
ATAPATTU ARACHCHIGE v RASIER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 230 [17 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 230 EMPC 211/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for an employment status declaration BETWEEN ATAPATTU ARACHCHIGE Plaintiff AND RASIER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant AND UBER B.V. Second Defendant Hearing:
...Appendix 3 – further information about population implications 1 Hazardous drinking carries an elevated risk of harm to individuals, whānau, community, future generations, and society. Approximately four out of five adults in New Zealand consume alcohol (meaning they had a drink in the last year).15 25% of adults who consume alcohol do so hazardously (meaning they have an established pattern of drinking that carries a high risk of future damage to physical or mental...
CLAIM NO: 00734 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN MONTGOMERY HENG AND ANNE ELIZABETH HENG Claimants AND CHRISTOPHER WALSHAW AND MARGARET ANNE WALSHAW First respondents (Intituling continued next page) Appearances: Scott Galloway, counsel for the claimants Chris Walshaw, for the first respondents Tim Cleary, counsel for the second respondent John Morrison, co
...hazard 3 overlay zones where they are stored in a manner that ensures risk from natural hazards is avoided, or is no more than low. {The Oil Companies appeal point 350} Rule 11.4.2 Assessment of development performance standard contraventions 9. Consequential amendment to Rule 11.4.2.3 Assessment of development performance standard contraventions - Hazardous substances quantity limits and storage requirements (Rule 9.3.4), as follows : 11.4.2 Assessment of development performance...
...or breaking the chain of causation (compare Farr v Butters Brothers & Co [1932] 2 KB 606 with Denny v Supplies & Transport Co Ltd [1950] 2 KB 374). But there can be no doubt that, whatever the rationale, a person who is injured through consuming or using a product of the defective nature of which he is well aware has no remedy against the manufacturer. In the case of a building, it is right to accept that a careless builder is liable, on the principle of Donoghue v Stevens...