Search Results

Search results for consumer consequential.

442 items matching your search terms

  1. [2018] NZEnvC 097 Handley v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

    ...for the use of PWA processes for road /~ / {\.; .~/., .,wYO \ stopping over those of the LGA (on the basis that the latter process is "cumbersome" and ! ~ ( '(';'.:.' i'\J"';; 1 ;1 potentially "time consuming"). The court has no capacity to give any such direction in the I "'" I :' '. .. J" \4~~ .. \ ~ ~~ c.X:" .. · //~:;.> \ .: " \, 'l-,~I , , ". :';~,,'.l>'...

  2. LCRO 13/2021 ZW v HN (25 November 2021) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...This would require him to particularise the specific conduct and circumstances which would establish and support Mr HN’s contention that his rights had been breached. [98] The work involved in laying this foundation would be significant and time consuming. But Mr ZW had the benefit, as he himself acknowledges, of a client who was experienced and proficient in arguing for prisoners’ rights. This was not the first occasion Mr HN had challenged the Corrections Department. He was a...

  3. RIS - Abortion Law Reform [pdf, 750 KB]

    Impact Statement: Abortion Law Reform | 1 Abortion law reform Advising agencies Ministry of Justice Decision sought This analysis has been prepared to inform decisions by Cabinet in its consideration of the Law Commission’s briefing paper about options to take a health approach to abortion law. Proposing Ministers Minister of Justice Summary: Problem and Proposed Approach Problem Definition What problem or opportunity does this proposal seek to address? Why is G

  4. [2019] NZSSAA 05 (31 January 2019) [pdf, 529 KB]

    [2019] NZSSAA 05 Reference No. SSA 047/17 & 071/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearings on 4 December 2017, and 9 November 2018. Appearances Mr Ord, Barrister and Solicitor, Nelson for the appellant Mr Stain

  5. D-G Conservation - EiC - M J Brass - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 455 KB]

    ...to ORC’s data and knowledge of indigenous freshwater values throughout Otago, and that gathering full M Brass Evidence: Proposed Plan Change 7 to Regional Plan: Water for Otago [DOC-6540513] 20 information can be costly and time-consuming for consent applicants. However, I do not consider this is necessarily a barrier to the changes sought in the D-G’s submission. As Dr Allibone’s evidence shows, there is already considerable data on species distribution, and fro...

  6. Smitheram v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 24 [pdf, 483 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101- 000048 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 24 BETWEEN VIVIENNE SMITHERAM AND BERNARD MCBRIDE Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND HANNA

  7. Proactive release - Electoral Amendment Bill and Referendums Framework Bill [pdf, 2.1 MB]

    ...also be less intimidating for people who are new to voting. 20. Currently, venues, or parts of venues, like supermarkets or hotels, cannot be designated as voting places if they are licensed premises. This applies even if no alcohol is consumed in the venue or the part of the venue being used as a voting place. Other venues (for example shopping malls) may be used for advance voting but are not used as voting places on election day because all voting places need to ha...

  8. Electoral-Matters-Bill_Communications-Tranche-26.pdf [pdf, 28 MB]

    Ministry of Justice Proactive release – Electoral Amendment Bill and Constitution Amendment Bill Date of issue: 05 December 2025 Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. • This release encompasses a wide range of email

  9. MacGregor v Craig (Second Interim Non-Publication Order) [2015] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 324 KB]

    ...Act had lent the process a quasi-judicial character and the requirement of observing the principles of natural justice had resulted in an elaborate and protracted system of provisional and final opinions. The length of the process and the resources consumed led the Re- Evaluation team to recommend a conciliation process to be carried out principally by staff rather than by Commissioners. Where this was unsuccessful, the complaint was to be referred to the (then) Proceedings Commissioner to...

  10. Hartley v Balemi [pdf, 401 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 1276 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN DAVID JASON HARTLEY and FLEUR DIANE HARTLEY Claimants AND No first respondent, Jack Balemi having been struck out AND BRENT BALEMI Second Respondent AND MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND No fourth respondent, Brent Warren Lee having been struck out AND No fifth respondents, Grace Kit Ha Mak and Wong & Bong Trustee Co Ltd h