Search Results

Search results for consumer consequential.

428 items matching your search terms

  1. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 [2023] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 [pdf, 629 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2021-100-002 [2023] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN HELEN BERNADETTE O’SULLIVAN, FIONA CHERIE WHITE & ANDREW RODGER WILTON as trustees of the WILTON FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND DEANE FLUIT BUILDER LTD First Respondent AND TAB DESIGN LTD (Removed) Second Respondent AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND HEMPEL (WATTYL) NEW ZEALAND LTD formally called VALSPAR PA

  2. Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INC Appellant A N D WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENT COURT AGAINST DECISION ON A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A REGIONAL WATER CATCHMEN

  3. Tranche 1 of Cabinet and Ministerial advice on changes to clubs and ranges regulations [pdf, 13 MB]

    © Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Nicole McKee Associate Minister of Justice Proactive release – Phase 2 of the Firearms Reform Programme – tranche 1 Date of issue: 5 September 2024 The following documents are here proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld because, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), it would not be released. Where this

  4. Regulatory Impact Statement Review of aspects of the bail system [pdf, 268 KB]

    1 Regulatory Impact Statement Bail Amendment Bill Agency disclosure statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ). It provides an analysis of options to address a range of problems identified in the Government‟s Review of Aspects of the Bail System. Problems relate to: bail for defendants charged with serious class A drug, violent and sexual offences and young defendants under 20; perceptions that bail may be granted in return

  5. Trustpower - EiC - S Styles - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 505 KB]

    Solicitors Acting: JR Welsh ChanceryGreen PO Box 47516, Ponsonby 1144 +64 9 357 0600 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-202-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the ‘Act’) AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under s149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred t

  6. [2016] NZEmpC 143 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd [pdf, 667 KB]

    ...vulnerability, the need for deterrence and the lack of persuasive evidence from the respondents I consider a penalty of $5,000 for the breaches in respect to each of the five workers appropriate. [44] Finally, the Labour Inspector challenges the consequential orders of the Authority set out at [28]-[29] of the determination. This is really only the formal order of the Authority and stands or falls on the decision of the first two grounds of challenge: [28] The first respondent...

  7. Reinstating-Three-Strikes-Sentencing-Law.pdf [pdf, 31 MB]

    Hon Nicole McKee Associate Minister of Justice (Three Strikes) Proactive release - Policy decisions: Reinstating three strikes sentencing law Date of issue: 11 June 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04 . Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been

  8. UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]

    ...finding could be made that Ms [VL]’s conduct was misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct. No purpose could properly be served by the making of a direction pursuant to s 209, so no such direction can properly be made. [84] As to the first option, consequential orders can only be imposed after a determination of misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct is made. For the reasons discussed in the Analysis section below, this review does not result in any such determination. [85] Mr [UK] submit...

  9. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [pdf, 289 KB]

    LCRO 173/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN G NP and H NP Applicant AND DC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] G NP and H NP (the NPs) have applied to review a decision by the [Area] Standards Committe

  10. Mr-Rasheeds-Submissions-of-37-Families.pdf [pdf, 619 KB]

    IN THE CORONER’S COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI KAITIROTIRO MATEWHAWHATI KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU CSU-2019-CCH-000165 to CSU-2019-CCH-000214; CSU-2019-CCH-000326 UNDER The Coroners Act 2006 AND IN THE MATTER OF An inquiry into the deaths of 51 people in relation to the 15 March 2019 Christchurch Masjid attacks __________________________________________________________________ SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL FOR 37 INTERESTED PARTIES Dated: 8 Februa