436 items matching your search terms
Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 July and 30 September 2023 Office of the Chief Coroner | 2023 (3) i Coroners’ recommendations and comments Coroners perform essential functions within our society. They inquire into a range of unexpected deaths to establish the identity of the person who has died and the cause and circumstances of their death. While inquiring into a dea
...of IPP 6. It is therefore not necessary to consider the alternative defence that the information was properly withheld from Mr Taylor under PA, s 29(1)(a). [3.2] While the watermark did obscure parts of a limited number of documents, there was no consequential interference (as defined in PA, s 66) with Mr Taylor’s privacy. The role of the Privacy Commissioner [4] Subsequent to the filing of these proceedings on 21 May 2015 the Privacy Commissioner by letter dated 19 June 2015 gave...
Forest & Bird v Bay of Plenty Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 147 IN THE MATTER OF an application under section 76 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 BETWEEN ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2020-AKL-183) Applicant AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick Environment Commissioner S C Myers Envir
...give people the impression that it is too late to fix the problem, which may cause L E T T E R R E M I N D E R S : E V I D E N C E F R O M F O U R T R I A L S 1 8 them to quickly disengage from the letter. The Simplified Letter retains the consequential tone of the Existing Letter. • Includes a deadline: The Simplified Letter includes a deadline of 10 days to pay the fine. Giving people a strict deadline can prevent them from procrastinating and forgetting to pay. • Rem...
' BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Auckland Registry ENV 2015 AKL 0000134 IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act TRUSTEES OF MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST Appellant BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF VINCENT CARLYLE KERR ON BEHALF OF MOTITIROHEMOANATRUST 25th October 2017 Counsel Acting RB Enright Barrister Level 1, Stanbeth House 28 Customs
Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination Summary of submissions Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to
Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 April and 30 June 2023 Office of the Chief Coroner | 2023 (2) i Coroners’ recommendations and comments Coroners perform essential functions within our society. They inquire into a range of unexpected deaths to establish the identity of the person who has died and the cause and circumstances of their death. While inquiring into a death,
CLAIM NO: 00277 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN SEAN SMITH Claimant AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 30 May & 1 June 2004 Appearances: Sean Smith in person as Claimant Susan Banbury & Georgina Grant for First Respondent Lawrence Ponniah for Second and Fourth Respondents Determination: 12 July 2004
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 12 April 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environme
LCRO 75/2017 210/2017 212/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SW Applicant and Respondent AND HB Respondent and Applicant The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms SW and Ms HB, both of whom are lawyers, applied for