17506 items matching your search terms
...[2020] NZEmpC 200 EMPC 139/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an objection to jurisdiction AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN MARK SINTON Plaintiff AND COATESVILLE MOTORS 2013 LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Mathews, advocate for the plaintiff P McBride, counsel for the defendant...
...WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 226 EMPC 243/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN AMANDA TURNER Plaintiff AND TE WHATU ORA – HEALTH NEW ZEALAND, IN RESPECT OF THE FORMER WAIRARAPA DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: E Lamb...
...ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Place: Rotorua Present: L R Harvey, Judge Date: 4 August 2003 Application No: A19990012658 Subject: Okahu B1A Section: 18(1)(c),18(1)(d)/93 Hearing: 30 October 2002 Previous Evidence 120 Aotea MB 271 DECISION AS TO COSTS Introduction Minute Book: 129 AOT 212 On 18 June 2003 in a Reserved Decision issued in respect of the above application, I invited the successful party to submit a memorandum on the issue of costs within 21 days, 128 Aotea MB 20...
...AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 130 ARC 40/14 IN THE MATTER OF challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for stay of execution AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN FRANIX CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Plaintiff AND BRYCE TOZER Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 7 and 14 July 2014 Appearances: D Dickinson, counsel for plaintiff H Fulton, counsel...
...reprimand him (s 93(1)(a)); [ii] order him to apologise to the appellant (s 93(1)(c); [iii] order him to undergo training or education (s 93(1)(d)); [iv] impose a fine of up to $15,000 (s 93(1)(d)); and/or [v] order him to pay the appellant any costs or expenses incurred in respect of the inquiry, investigation, or hearing by the Committee (s 93(1)(i)). [b] In respect of the third respondent: [i] censure or reprimand it (s 93(1)(a)); [ii] order it to apologise to the appella...
...RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Mr R Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr and Mrs Heather in person Mr A Darroch for First Defendants Ms M Coleman for Second Defendant DATE OF DECISION: 23 May 2012 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS 2 Introduction [1] These proceedings were commenced by statement of claim dated 4 December 2010. Subsequently, following other discussions, Mr and Mrs Heather gave notice on 3 February 2012 that they were withdrawing their...
...DRAINLAYERS BOARD NZ Defendant Hearing: Submissions and letters received on 25 November 2005, 21 June and 7 August 2006 for the defendant and 4 August, 19 October and 27 November 2006 for the plaintiff Judgment: 18 December 2006 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The defendant successfully defended the plaintiff’s de novo challenge against a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. The determination dismissed his personal grievance claim that he...
...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: S Winter for the Appellant C Hlavac for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 1 March 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This judgment concerns costs relating to Mr Hughes’ appeal of 18 July 2018. The appeal is against the decision of a Reviewer who dismissed a review of the Corp...
...___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The second respondent, QBE, seeks a determination of a question of law. [2] The question is: Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction under s 45(1) of the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 to determine issues as to costs between IAG and QBE under clauses 17.1 and 17.2 of the 2012 Rebuild Solution Management Agreement between IAG New Zealand, Hawkins Management Limited and Hawkins Group...
...Respondent Environment Judge DA Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act On the papers AA Hopkinson and VC Brewer for the Applicant L Burkhardt for the Respondent 23 August 2017 2 3 AUG 2017 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON COSTS A: Vision Charitable Trust is ordered to pay the sum of $2,500.00 to the Bay of Plenty Regional Council REASONS [1] Bay of Plenty Regional Council (BOPRC) seeks costs against Vision Charitable Trust (VCT) following the resolution of...