Search Results

1. Zagorski v Wilkinson Building and Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 43 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ............................................................................................................ 8 Loss of Rental ............................................................................................. 9 Interest ........................................................................................................ 9 Costs ......................................................................................................... 10 Conclusion as to Quantum ...................

2. [2019] NZEnvC 095 View West Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC Oq 5 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for costs pursuant to s285 of the Act VIEW WEST LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-151 ) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Judge: J A Smith sitting alone pursuant to s279 of the Act Appearances : P Senior and Ms B Tree for View West Limited (View West) R J O'Connor for Auckland Council Dat...

3. CH v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1617 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...Property. Q Ltd had installed the Heating System, and had also replaced all the plumbing so none of the previous plumbing remained. 2. CH says that the Heating System was not installed correctly. He claims damages of $29,735.56 from Q Ltd, being the costs he has incurred to date to remedy the problems with the Heating System, and the costs associated with replacing the remaining pipes and fittings. 3. Q Ltd counterclaims for damages of $29,735.56 seeking an order that, if CH’s clai...

4. AQ v ZI LCRO 105 / 2010 (11 February 2011) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...has no issue with bills rendered up to 22 October 2008. [5] However, by that time, even with a considerable “discount” on the time recorded, the Applicant and other members of the family whom he represented, were becoming concerned that the costs incurred were going to exceed the anticipated overall costs of $50,000.00. [6] In addition, the Applicant noted inconsistencies in subsequent bills received by him in January and March 2009. [7] On 2 April 2009, the Applicant made...

5. Smith v Wellington City Council [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...22 8 CRAIG CANDY 25 9 MARK DALY 29 10 WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL 30 11 CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE 35 Failure to Mitigate 36 Failure to Maintain 37 12 CONTRIBUTION BETWEEN RESPONDENTS 37 13 COSTS 40 14 ORDERS 40 792-989-Smith/Prestwood page 3 of 42

6. Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...Ninth Respondent AND REGENCY PLUMBING LIMITED (Removed) Tenth Respondent AND CRAIG GORDON (Removed) Eleventh Respondent AND MARK PAINTON Twelfth Respondent AND ELDON ARCHER (Removed) Thirteenth Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: P A McConnell Page 2 of 8 [1] Max Grant Architects Limited and Alan Maxwell Grant (the respondents) have applied for costs against the claimants. They submit the claim against them was lacking in substantial...

7. Baker v High Court (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 696 KB]

   ...person Ms B McKenna and Ms RM McMenamin for first and second defendants Mr MJ McKillop and Ms CPC Wrightson for third and fourth defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 26 January 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as Baker v High Court (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 4. Note publication restrictions. Those restrictions require this decision to be anonymised by the redaction of the true name of the plaintiff. In substit...

8. EZ v LH [2021] NZDT 1585 (6 July 2021) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...subsequently sold [Address 2] to a third party. EZ has claimed $30,000.00 from LH for the cost of building a retaining wall and replacing the current fence along the boundary of the properties. LH has also filed a counterclaim for $4,233.85 for the costs she has incurred defending EZ’s claim against her. 2. The issues to be determined by the Tribunal were: a. Is LH responsible for half the cost of replacing the current fence? b. Is LH responsible for the cost of building a reta...

9. GSTech Ltd v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...127 [31 October 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 127 EMPC 372/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN GSTECH LIMITED Plaintiff AND A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P McBride and F Lear, counsel for...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 64/06 Watson v NZ Electrical Traders Ltd t/a Bray Switchgear [pdf, 24 KB]

    ...SWITCHGEAR Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 27 October and 9 and 17 November 2006 Judgment: 24 November 2006 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] On 12 July 2006 the Employment Relations Authority issued its costs determination following its earlier conclusion that David Watson had been dismissed unjustifiably by New Zealand Electrical Traders Limited that trades as Bray Switchgear. Mr Watson challenges the costs ordered by the Authority t...