18202 items matching your search terms
...BETWEEN WAYS ELECTRONICS LIMITED Plaintiff AND SAURABH SHARMA Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J A Hope, counsel for plaintiff S Sharma, in person Judgment: 22 October 2019 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL [1] This judgment resolves a costs application which was made after the filing of a notice of discontinuance. [2] Ways Electronics Limited (WEL) was dissatisfied with a determination of the Employment R...
...Counsel for Plaintiff Lawrence Ponniah, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 30 November 2009 ORAL INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] The plaintiff, a private company, applies to join, as another plaintiff in its challenge to a costs determination of the Employment Relations Authority, its managing director who was an original named party in the Authority. That application is opposed by Philip Dunn although it was Mr Dunn who originally nominated the director,...
...JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Scarborough in person Mr CHB Bennett, agent for first defendant Mr AJ Lloyd and Mr JCS Kimpton for second defendant DATE OF HEARING: 2 and 3 December 2015 DATE OF DECISION: 16 December 2015 DATE OF COSTS DECISION: 24 February 2016 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS APPLICATION BY KELLY SERVICES LTD1 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Scarborough v Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd...
...Respondent Hearing: 23 November 2021 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua-Nui-A-Kahumatamomoe Appearances: C Leaf for the appellant C Hlavac for the respondent Judgment: 29 November 2021 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs, relating to an appeal under the Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This decision concerns a claim for costs by Mr Leaf, the advocate representing Mr Taylor in his appeal under the Accident Compensation Act 2001...
...request for an extension. [3] On 22 February 2022, counsel for the claimants filed a memorandum, dated 19 February 2022, requesting that the determination dated 4 February 2022 be recalled and amended to adjust the quantum of the remedial costs. Background [4] At the beginning of day 1 of the hearing on 6 May 2021, I queried what the claimants were claiming for remedial costs.1 That early discussion mentioned figures of $402,426, Woodview Construction’s cost summary of...
...it was repaired and groomed at a cost of $1,785.10. The sale price, after that work was done, reached the amount of $4,995.00 (which happens to be the original purchase price of the car). The finance company claims those additional costs of 1,785.10 but off-sets that amount in part against a refund of $1,000.00 for part of the cost of the warranty. The net proceeds of the sale as calculated by it are then $4,209.90. [6] The finance company claims that the amount to se...
...(Appellant) GJ Mathias for Whangarei District Council Respondent M & C Tipton & W Cleary for themselves (Tiptons) No submissions from Mr Bielby or S McKerrow 14 February 2019 15 February 2019 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON APPLICATION FOR COSTS A. The proceedings have been withdrawn and are at an end. B. As to the issue of costs, the Appellant, Segmental Liners Ltd is to pay to M & C Tipton and W Cleary jointly the sum of $600 (including GST) as a contribution...
...TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 133 EMPC 343/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN RIO NGAWAKA Plaintiff AND GLOBAL SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: R Ngawaka, plaintiff in person R Johnson, agent for defendant Judgment:...
...DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND GEORGE MAREVICH Fifth Respondent AND ROOF IMPROVEMENTS LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND BARRY WALSH Seventh Respondent AND JAMES MCLEAN Eighth Respondent DETERMINATION ON COSTS (Application for Costs following Final Determination) Dated 16 November 2012 2 Introduction [1] Following the final determination of 13 August 2012, the claimants have sought costs against Auckland Council, th...
...should. 3. Mr T sent in a contractor many times in 2017 and 2018 to repair the System, but problems persisted. Eventually, in 2019, Ms E hired her own contractor to fix the System. She has filed a claim seeking $27,100.30, made up of repair costs of $13,012.80 and legal costs of $14,087.50. 4. Mr T defends the claim on the basis that the repair costs and legal expenses are unreasonable. He notes that the Company has been removed from the Register, but he accepts personal re...