Search Results

1. [2021] NZREADT 14 - Ogilvie v The Real Estate Agents Authority & Abel (6 April 2021) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...because Ms Ogilvie wanted Ms W to wait six to eight weeks before 2 At [32]. she accepted the offer, and secondly because the building inspection report disclosed issues with bathrooms and under the house that would have involved additional costs. [29] Ms W also provided the investigator with an email sent to Ms Domney on 5 November 2018 (copied to her solicitor) in which she formally withdrew her offer on the property. Ms W said: Further to my text sent to you yesterday...

2. Kupa v Kupa - Lot 10H and 101 Pt Omahu 2C1C (2020) 85 Takitimu MB 189 (85 TKT 189) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...order is confirmed as the terms of trust. [28] The 0.5 share in Omahu 2C1C is vested in Mare Reiharangi Kupa (Senior), Hallam Ngarupa Kupa, Melvia Batash Kupa, Winifred Maree Kupa, Deveen Mary Marise Kupa as trustees. [29] There is no order as to costs. Ka pānuitia te whakataunga i te Kooti a te tekau mā tahi karaka o te rā, tekau o Noema 2020 Pronounced in open Court at 11:00am on 10th November 2020 L R Harvey JUDGE

3. 2021-04-14 Beef + Lamb - ORC PC7 - Opening submissions [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...in increased area of irrigation without necessarily increasing contaminant losses to the environment or increased water use, should be encouraged to do so. Otago has a high number of border dyke or flood irrigation still in use, and between the cost of changing to a more efficient system and the prospect of applying for a non-complying activity resource consent there is no incentive for farmers to change to systems with a lower environmental impact. 40. Furthermore, a pathway should...

4. LCRO 247/2014 GG v HH and II (15 August 2017) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...receive a distribution. [14] Mr HH and Mr II spent some time attempting to break the deadlock without success. Mr HH sought independent legal advice on the validity of Mrs GG’s appointment as a trustee. He preferred that alternative to the more costly option of applying to the High Court for orders. The advice Mr HH received was that Mrs GG’s appointment could be invalid, and if it were, that would leave him as sole trustee. 3 [15] Mr HH says he passed the legal advice on...

5. Hakiwai - Owhaoko C1, C2, C4, C5, and C7 (2016) 52 Takitimu MB 130 (52 TKT 130) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...provide a report to the Court within two weeks on the issues surrounding the purchase of the investment property. 52 Tākitimu MB 137 [32] Application A20160005059 filed by the trust for directions per s 67 of the Act is now concluded. [33] Costs are reserved. These orders are to issue immediately, per r 7.5, Māori Land Court Rules 2011 Pronounced at 4.10 pm in Rotorua on Friday this 9 th day of September 2016 L R Harvey JUDGE

6. Samuels v Te Proprietors of Matauri X Inc - Matauri X Inc (2006) 6 Taitokerau Appellate MB 332 (6 APWH 332) [pdf, 634 KB]

   ...vote by more than five persons present in person at the meeting. It follows that the resolution was validly made by the general meeting and the Court below was entitled to make the order that it did. [35] The appeal is dismissed accordingly. All costs should lie where they fall. V Williams CHIEF JUDGE (Presiding) for the Coram Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10

7. LCRO 65/2017 IR v NW and EN (18 April 2019) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) file number for that complaint is 15684 (the first complaint). [3] Mr NW responded to the first complaint and instructed Mr EN to make submissions on his behalf with respect to his fees and a report prepared by a costs assessor. The question for the Committee was whether Mr NW’s fees were fair and reasonable for the work he had done in respect of the administration of Mr IR’s mother’s 2 estate. Mr NW and Mr IR’s cousin, Ms SE, were the...

8. Potroz - Mohakatino Parininihi 1C West 3A2 (2018) 388 Aotea MB 233 (388 AOT 233) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...to the delays – more so once I had been alerted to these representations. In any event, the delay in issuing this decision is regretted. Decision [17] The application received on 26 March 2018 is granted. [18] There will be no order as to costs. These orders are to issue immediately, per r 7.5 Māori Land Court Rules 2011. Pronounced at 4.35pm in Rotorua on Friday this 24th day of August 2018. L R Harvey JUDGE

9. [2021] NZACC 2 - Judkins v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...perform 9 it, or was significantly greater for persons who were employed in that type of environment than for persons who were not. [30] The decision of the Reviewer of 2019 is upheld. This appeal is dismissed. [31] I make no order as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: Medico Law, Auckland for the respondent

10. Panapa - Ngawhare rāua ko Merepapuha Raukura Maika Te Rangipuawhe Whānau Trust (2017) 159 Waiariki MB 277 (159 WAR 277) [pdf, 228 KB]

    ...trust. Pursuant to s 40 of the Act I direct the Registrar to engage an accountant to report on matters of accounts so that the Court can establish the exact amount to be paid to the Frank and Ngarangimihi Maika Whānau Trust Whānau Trust. The cost of that report is to be paid for from the Māori Land Court Special Aid Fund pursuant to s 98 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. [38] Application A20160005630 (Mere Pupuha Raukura Maika - Succession (further interests) will be referre...