Search Results

1. LCRO 110/2017 EB v APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF A PROSECUTORIAL DECISION [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...dividends collected and held by Mr EB; (c) had never received details of the funds Mr EB had been holding, and was unaware that he was doing so; 6 (d) said she had been apprehensive about uplifting her file from Mr EB lest that incur further costs; and (e) noted that her core complaint was that Mr EB had been holding money on her behalf after she had instructed him to cease work. Notice of Hearing [30] The Standards Committee resolved to set the matter down for a hearing o...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 132 Waikato District Health Board v Archibald [pdf, 457 KB]

   ...level of travel involved in their work. In this regard, it was stated that: Having staff close to these areas, although with a willingness to travel to other areas and to Hamilton for training and to support work, has the potential to lessen the costs of travel into many of the hard-to-reach communities in the Waikato. It is recognised by the team that they are making a significant change in moving to a settings-based approach in their work. Allocation to a settings team will a...

3. Firmin v ACC [2013] NZACA 15 [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...the Secretary of Defence and made the Singapore allowance tax-free. The letter also stated that throughout Mr Firmin’s career, including the time he was stationed in Singapore, he was accommodated in Army barracks and fed in Army messes and the costs were deducted from his fortnightly pay. [18] On 24 February 2005, ACC issued a decision concerning all the allowances. The decision letter stated that the Army had advised that the clothing allowances had been included in Mr Firmin...

4. NU v ZY LCRO 239/2012 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...contacting Mrs EL. (f) He rejected suggestion that he had been discourteous to Mr NU. (g) He rejected allegation that any elements of his statement made to the Police was inappropriate. (h) Mr NU’s position was compromised and self interested. (i) Costs occurred by his firm were appropriate. (j) He perceived his duty to be to protect his vulnerable elderly client, as best he could. [26] The Standards Committee described Mr NU’s complaints as “numerous” and “highly det...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 68 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...forestry ; Māori economic development institutions and law 10 Justice system Legal aid, barriers to accessing courts, colonial justice system, Supreme Court/Privy Council ; criminal justice system ; Māori land law, succession, court procedure and costs 11 Citizenship rights and equality Human rights, racial discrimination The Chairperson’s memorandum setting out the kaupapa inquiry programme can be downloaded from : www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/waitangi-tribunal/news/ 6 N...

6. [2021] NZACC 40 - OBrian v ACC (25 February 2021) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...give weight. Taking a non-niggardly approach and upon the 5 ACC v Ambros [2007]NZCA 304 principles in Ambros I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the appeal must be and is allowed. [47] Mr O’Brian is entitled to costs and disbursements, which I hope counsel will be able to resolve between them. If not, then I will receive memoranda. Nicola Mathers District Court Judge

7. [2017] NZEmpC 33 NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc and Anor v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...[75] The difficulty which arises with regard to the proposition that wages should be based on previous seasons is the uncontradicted evidence that when a season begins is primarily determined by stock availability, as well as price and operating costs. Mr Gerrard’s evidence was that having regard to the provisions as to minimum wages which would apply under the based-on iea, and having regard to the availability of stock in the Hawkes Bay, the Wairoa plant would not have reopened...

8. Ram v Tan [2016] NZIACDT 39 (9 August 2016) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...[74] The Tribunal has upheld the complaint; pursuant to section 51 of the Act, it may impose sanctions. [75] The Authority and the complainant have the opportunity to provide submissions on the appropriate sanctions, including potential orders for costs, refund of fees and compensation. Whether they do so or not, Mr Tan is entitled to make submissions and respond to any submissions from the other parties. [76] Any application for an order for the payment of costs or expenses under secti...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 123 Henderson v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...determination of the Authority is dismissed. The DHB’s challenge to the determination of the Authority is successful and the decision that Dr Henderson was unjustifiably disadvantaged in her employment is set aside and replaced by this judgment. [88] Costs are reserved. If the parties are unable to agree on costs arising from this proceeding, the DHB may lodge a memorandum within 20 working days and Dr Henderson may have a further 20 working days to respond. K G...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 029 Cable Bay Wines Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...adjacent to the original restaurant; Cable Bay Wines Limited & Motukaha Investments Limited v Auckland Council 2 D. Refusal of that part of the original application relating to outdoor hospitality, excepting Band C above, is confirmed. E. Costs remain reserved. REASONS Introduction [1] This appeal was against refusal by Auckland Council of a retrospective resource consent application for unconsented activities on the appellants' (collectively called "Cable Bay...