17539 items matching your search terms
...dates and the Registrar is requested to issue a notice of hearing accordingly. The pre-hearing conference is now concluded but leave is 15 reserved for any party to make any further applications for directions that may be necessary. All questions of costs are reserved. 20 25 30 35 40
...filed an application seeking a judicial conference which was subsequently held on 8 July 2013. 11 Mr Walters was concerned that the survey would affect all whānau land blocks comprised in the Paenoa Te Akau block and raised issues as to the costs of survey. I adjourned the application to allow further research to be undertaken. [12] A further hearing was held on 20 September 2013 to discuss the recommendations set out in Mr Low’s report. Ruth Newton on behalf of the Ngahuia...
...no ability to provide for whangai. More significantly, it can only be dealt with by the Court if formal administration has been granted by the High Court. Very often Māori successors do not seek formal administration of estates because of the cost involved and the need to engage lawyers and the land is left in the name of deceased owners. That is the case here. [24] Third, the 1993 Act’s restrictions on alienation do not apply to General land. Conversely, the Property (Relations...
...Unfortunately, due to a clerical error Brenda was advised that the visit 35 Taitokerau MB 153 would take place on 21 July 2010. Brenda travelled from Auckland to Kaitaia on 21 July 2010 only to discover that there was no visit that day. (Her travel costs have since been met by the Court’s Special Aid Fund). The visit on 27 July 2010 did not go ahead as on that occasion Mr Lunjevich was not home. Eventually a visit did go ahead on 13 September 2010. In attendance were Mr Lun...
...rehearing is granted. [32] The orders issued on 13 December 2011 terminating the life interest of Lloyd Couper are annulled. [33] The Registrar will provide a copy of this decision to the Lake Taupō Forest Trust and other affected parties. Costs [34] Both counsel have sought assistance from the Special Aid Fund. Mr Peterson’s original estimate for approximately $1,500 was approved prior to hearing. However, in light of the evidence that his client is in receipt of $14,000 p...
...application. Decision [29] The application to create an ahu whenua trust is declined as the evidence confirms that a majority of owners in each of the blocks are opposed. The application is accordingly dismissed [30] There will be no order as to costs. These orders are for immediate release, per r7.5, Māori Land Court Rules 2011 Pronounced at 2.15 pm in Masterton on Friday this 7th day of March 2014 L R Harvey JUDGE
...favour of the children of Clark Takurua deceased according to the terms of his will dated 19 July 1996 subject to a life interest for Judith Takurua per ss18, 99(2), 113 and 117 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. [32] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced at 2.45 pm in Rotorua on Wednesday this 22 nd day of June 2011 L R Harvey JUDGE
...have consent from my brothers and sisters. There has been raruraru amongst our family fighting over this issue of setting up application for a trust earlier on in the process by my sister Lil. She was wanting to go to Guardian Trust and do it at cost and we don’t there is a need to go to those lengths. We don’t want to take it out of the Maori Land Court and into somebody else’s hands. We’re here today with our mother and the consensus of our brothers who are distant from us....
...Morris, the initial complainant referred to above, the sum of $2,383.33 forthwith being the loss which Mr Morris has suffered by reason of the defendant’s misconduct; 7 [c] We order that the defendant forthwith pay $1,000 towards the costs of the Real Estate Agents Authority relating to this prosecution. [35] The above are our reasons for the sentencing package we imposed on the defendant at the end of the hearing on 20 February 2012 when we made it clear that the sus...
...of Appeal applied the proviso and dismissed the appeal. 4 On 27 October 2011, a Wellington Standards Committee determined that there had been unsatisfactory conduct on the Practitioner’s part. The Practitioner was censured and ordered to pay costs of $500. 5 At some point on or about 31 October 2011, the Practitioner approached Mr E and thereafter commenced to act for Mr E in an application to the Governor-General. Any such application would necessarily require reliance on the matt...