Search Results

Search results for costs.

17539 items matching your search terms

  1. Auckland Standards Committee v Mellett [2014] NZLCDT 46 [pdf, 73 KB]

    ...client, in respect of whom the practitioner failed to file an information capsule in time, resulting in summary judgment being obtained against the client. To make matters worse the practitioner promised to apply to set aside the judgment at his own cost but in fact did nothing about this. Once again this complaint arises out of a period between July 2012 and October 2012 during a period when we now know that the practitioner was once again seriously depressed and not coping with hi...

  2. Waller v CAC 20006 & Robin [2014] NZREADT 45 [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...definition of “misconduct” in s 73 of the Act. [37] It is possible to regard the penalty imposed by the Committee as a little kind and to consider that, perhaps, the licensee should also have been fined – if only, in effect, to contribute to the cost of the hearing before the Committee. Nevertheless, a finding of unsatisfactory conduct and publication of the decisions of the Committee and of this Tribunal reflect a just outcome in all the circumstances. [38] Accordingly, this a...

  3. Coleman v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 41 [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...claimants in these proceedings are Patricia Bamford, the owner of Unit 112B Remuera Road and Robyn Coleman, the owner of Unit 112D. These units are leaky homes and Ms Bamford and Ms Coleman claim that the Auckland Council is liable for the estimated cost of repair, consequential losses and damages. Mr Apers, the fourth respondent, provided a pre-purchase report for Ms Coleman. [2] At the commencement of the hearing on 19 July 2012 Mr Rainey and Ms Divich advised that ther...

  4. Deputy Registrar - Waima North B1 and Waima North B2 (2010) 5 Taitokerau MB 211 (5 TTK 211) [pdf, 83 KB]

    ...make the required survey. (6) Notwithstanding anything in subsections (1) to (4) of this section, the Chief Surveyor shall not appoint or authorise any surveyor to make a survey under this section unless the Chief Surveyor is satisfied that the cost of the proposed survey has been paid or has been sufficiently secured. [16] As s 332(1) makes clear, in directing that the Court “may” transmit a survey requisition the Court has a discretion in deciding whether or not to do so. As th...

  5. Provider manual: 1a limited approvals operational policy [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...particular proceeding the applicant seeks limited approval for: (i) any urgency requirements; (ii) any upcoming scheduled appearances; (iii) the applicant’s previous relationship with the client(s) (if any), particularly on related matters, and the cost efficiencies to legal aid as a result; (iv) any unique legal or factual issues, or specialist skills required, that make the applicant particularly suitable to provide the relevant services; and (v) the amount of work already underta...

  6. [2016] NZSSAA 028 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...a mandatory basis include: old age pension, early retirement pension, disability pension, survivor’s pension, minimum pension, basic pension, occupational rehabilitation, compensation allowance due to physical damage, and reimbursement of travel costs incurred in relation to the exercise of the rights provided. [19] The entitlements which arise under the Pension Insurance Act are one part of the programme for income support in Croatia. [20] The document “Your Social Security Rights...

  7. XX v BA LCRO 273/2013, 343/2013, 040/2014 (15 July 2015) [pdf, 60 KB]

    ...conduct against Mr XX pursuant to s 152(2)(b) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). Under s 156(1) of the Act, the Committee censured Mr XX, ordered him to rectify his failure to provide a client file to Ms BA, and to pay a fine and costs to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS). The second decision ordered Mr XX to pay compensation to Ms BA’s client pursuant to s 156(1)(d) of the Act. The third directed publication of details identifying him after the NZLS Board had...

  8. AM v SB LCRO 316/2012 (28 July 2015) [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...effectively assuming his debt, she appears to have an interest beyond the purely professional in his litigation. Beyond “pro bono”, there is no evidence of what the arrangements were between Ms SB and her client. The overall outcome is an apparent cost to Ms SB, in exchange for her professional growth, and a net benefit to Mr TX. [25] There is no evidence of Mr TX having expressed concern over anything Ms SB has done for him. There is no evidence of him expressing any doubt...

  9. UI v OQ LCRO 225/2011 (8 March 2013) [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...on the initiative of the Practitioner in order to assist his better understanding of the resource management process, as he was endeavouring to see whether there was any procedural basis for challenging the Council. That it was obtained without cost to the Applicant is immaterial. The Practitioner had a duty to carefully consider all information under his review and to advise the Applicant on the basis of that information. [34] I accept that the Practitioner did not give the App...