17532 items matching your search terms
...derived from Whānaupani are her siblings and their successors. [34] Those entitled to succeed to the interests derived from Tiaki Tio are the aunts and uncles (with substitution for issue) of Jackie Te Ratu Tio. [35] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced at am/pm in on this day of 2013 L R Harvey JUDGE
...mentoring of agents. If the applicant were to leave that work setting or structure, 8 then there may be a case for further thought upon his next annual licence renewal point. [43] Accordingly this application is granted. No question of costs or disbursements seems to arise but we reserve leave to apply should there be any consequential matters. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Ms J Robson Memb...
...accordingly we ask all three members to step aside for the consideration of penalties and that a separate panel replace it ...” [8] Then, constructively, the appellants submit that Mr Barnett should be ordered to surrender his licence, be fined, pay full costs to the Tribunal; pay an amount towards the time of the vendors; pay an amount equal to the commission to the vendors; and that should he ever wish to trade as a licensee he should make a fresh application, presumably, to the Regi...
...parties on this possibility. Further directions are likely to be issued on this point. Decision [25] The request from Haimoana Maruera and Anthony Whareaitu that I recuse myself from hearing the present application is declined. [26] Costs are reserved. Pronounced at 4.40 pm in Rotorua on this 30 th day of March 2015 L R Harvey JUDGE
...month on what next steps are to be taken, given the delays to date. Decision [33] The application by the Horowhenua District Council to strike out the application of Phillip Taueki is dismissed. [34] The parties may exchange memoranda as to costs within 1 month. Pronounced in open Court at 5.00 pm Rotorua in on the 21st day of May 2015 L R Harvey JUDGE
...signed statement from Duncan Bell on behalf of the company doing the construction work on PBH’s land) have added additional information in relation to Mr Pere’s obstruction of the roadway. Mr Hogg confirms that PBH has incurred delays and costs as a result of Mr Pere’s actions. He is concerned that Mr Pere’s actions represent a threat to the safety of PBH, its agents and invitees. Mr Bell confirms that Mr Pere has interfered with access to the construction site on a number...
...the first time on 3 July 2013. It was heard with an application for the determination of ownership of the utility shed. I made an order under s 18(1)(a) in favour of Mr Wairua and I directed the Deputy Registrar conduct a meeting of owners. The costs of the meeting were to be met by the Māori Land Court. The Deputy Registrar was required to produce a report under s 40 recording the outcome of a vote on the application by shares and by numbers of owners. [6] The meeting was adverti...
...the Chief Registrar to follow through on that matter. A copy of this decision is to be sent to the Chief Registrar. [38] Finally, Mr Shanahan has filed his final invoice for services dated 7 October 2014. I thank him for his attendances. His costs are in order. Pursuant to s 98(9) of the Act I approve payment out of the Special Aid Fund to Mr Shanahan in the sum of $856.75. [39] Pursuant to Rule 7.5(2)(b) of the Rules the orders are to issue immediately. Pronounced in open Co...
...resolution. [26] The applicant has failed to satisfy the statutory pre-requisites for partition and the application must fail. Decision [27] The application for a partition is dismissed. [28] My preliminary view without submissions is that costs should lie where they fall, but if counsel wishes to pursue the matter he has 14 days to file a memorandum. Pronounced at Wellington this 15th day of October 2014. S F Reeves JUDGE
...clients to establish their own sewerage facility. This would mean that the existing facility had to be closed off for use by any owners of the land. This she argued was in effect a tit for tat response by Mr Carroll which would only result in further cost and inconvenience to all of the owners and occupiers of the land. [15] Ms Bennett argued that there was no basis for the Court making any finding of trespass sufficient to warrant the remedies sought. She contended that the applic...