Search Results

1. Trustees in the Section 14 Block XIII Tautuku Trust v Cairns - Part Section 3 Block XIII Survey District (2015) 29 Te Waipounamu MB 48 (29 TWP 48) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...lack of jurisdiction and are dismissed. [59] The parties are invited to make further submissions on whether it is necessary for an injunction to be issued under s 19 of TTWMA in order for the trustees to recover the Heads Block lands. [60] Costs are reserved. Pronounced in open Court at 10am in Invercargill on the 16 th day of March 2015. SF Reeves JUDGE

2. Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2011) 45 Waiariki MB 252 (45 WAR 252) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...appointed a responsible trustee by way of replacement for the late Mrs Emery per section 239 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. [43] The application for the appointment of Tamarapa Lloyd as a trustee is dismissed. [44] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced in open court at 11.55 am in Rotorua on the 23rd day of December 2011 L R Harvey JUDGE

3. Lee v CAC 10048 & Cho [2012] NZREADT 65 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...for Mr Cho, that her legal fees be paid, that she be paid the sum of $50,000 and that Mr Cho pay a fine 4 of $10,000 to the Authority. She sought an order that Barfoot and Thompson make its business available for inspection and that her costs or expenses incurred in respect of the enquiry or investigation be paid. [11] Mrs Lee’s appeal raises the same seven issues. She also appeals on penalty. This decision explores these issues which are:- (1) When signing the So...

4. [2015] NZSSAA 009, 13 February [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...the Chief Executive that no steps should be taken to recover the debt. The debt is to be recovered. Any repayments must take into account the appellant’s modest financial circumstances and ensure that she has sufficient to meet her basic living costs. The rate of recovery is to be no more than $25 per week unless the appellant elects to pay more. The amount of recovery may need to be further adjusted from time to time according to the appellant’s circumstances.

5. Goodhew v CAC 20004 & Anor [2013] NZREADT 100 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...and it was inevitable that a building consent would also require resource consent. He submitted that there was no case to answer on this point. [32] Mr James sought to have all charges dismissed and asked for the Tribunal to comment on whether costs could be exercised in favour of the defendants. Discussion [33] The Tribunal will deal with the charge and then consider what other further orders (if any) need to be made in respect of the appeal. [34] The Tribunal must determine...

6. Khan v New Zealand Law Society [2014] NZLCDT 18 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...Conveyancing Practitioners’ Fidelity Fund; or (iii) the person does not hold any professional indemnity insurance required by rules made under section 99 or is otherwise in breach of any such rules; or (iv) the person has failed to pay any costs or expenses for which the person is liable under this Act or any regulations, rules, or resolutions made under this Act: (i) any other matters the regulatory society thinks appropriate. (3) A person may be considered to be a fit and p...

7. IHC NZ v Ministry of Education (Non-Party Access) [2013] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...in the public interest. [5.4] In BNZ Investments the applicant was seeking access to the evidence of eight expert witnesses. The concern was that the applicant was attempting to access a large amount of research without having to pay for its true cost. The present case is distinguishable in that Chen Palmer seeks access only to the current statement of claim and statement in reply. The law to be applied [6] Both the Human Rights Act 1993 and the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulat...

8. Legal aid consultation paper: new family legal support - September 2013 [pdf, 457 KB]

   ...forms Fee C $250* (50% of total) Disbursements Travel Interpreter Other $Actual/reasonable $Actual/reasonable $Actual/reasonable *The higher payment for assistance with court forms where a client has changed lawyers means a total cost of $625 for the provision of legal support for that client, ie, $375 to the first lawyer and $250 to the second. Note: 1. These activity fees are not repeatable and may be claimed once only per case. Clients who wish to file cros...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 191 Ohms v Vice-Chancellor Auckland University of Technology [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...incorrect. In all events, if the applicant does intend to pursue a recusal application, it is important that he does so promptly so as to enable the Authority to deal with the matter in a timely way prior to the scheduled investigation date. [44] Costs are reserved. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 2.45 pm on 16 October 2013

10. [2013] NZEmpC 15 Vulcan-Steel Ltd v Wonnnocott [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...determination. It follows, in my conclusion, that Mr Wonnocott is entitled to have the Authority determine that disadvantage grievance on its merits. The matter remains with the Authority for those purposes and the challenge is dismissed with costs. If these cannot be addressed, Mr Wonnocott may apply by memorandum filed within 30 days, with Vulcan having the same period to respond. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 8.30 am on Wednesday 20 February 2013...