Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC AC 4/08 NZ Airline Pilots Association Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...payment of interest in terms of this order as soon as possible, subject to such directions as to the timing of payment as may be given in the event that the proceedings are brought on pursuant to paragraph 5 below. 3 There is no issue as to costs and disbursements between the parties in relation to this proceeding. 4 The defendant is to report to the plaintiff in writing at two monthly intervals, commencing two months from the date of this Court’s reserved judgment...

2. [2009] NZEmpC WC 14/09 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...judgment, the matters at issue remain unresolved, either party or both may contact the Registrar who will arrange a telephone conference call with a single Judge to set the parameters for a hearing of the remaining issues. [55] We reserve costs. GL Colgan Chief Judge for the full Court Judgment signed at 3 pm on Wednesday 10 June 2009

3. [2012] NZEmpC 204 Here v McAlphine Hussman Ltd [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...probabilities that the company’s decision to dismiss the plaintiff and the procedure that was followed were what a fair and reasonable employer would have done in all of the circumstances. [49] The challenge is accordingly dismissed. [50] If costs cannot otherwise be agreed they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda, with the defendant to file and serve any memorandum and supporting material within 20 working days of the date of this judgment, and the plaintiff to file...

4. [2013] NZEmpC 34 Baker v St John Central Regional Trust Board [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...employee, I would not have imposed a penalty in the circumstances and having regard to the sort of conduct that generally attracts such awards. 23 [43] For these reasons the plaintiff’s challenge is dismissed. [44] The defendant asked that costs be reserved. If they cannot otherwise be agreed, they can be the subject of an exchange of memoranda with the defendant to file and serve any memorandum and supporting material within 20 days of the date of this judgment and the plain...

5. CAC20009 v Li [2015] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...vendors that she was one of the purchasers. However she admitted the charge. Both the vendor and the purchaser supported her. Her non-disclosure had not caused any loss. She had her licence suspended for six months and she was fined $10,000 and costs. [12] In Hart v the Auckland Standards Committee 1 and New Zealand Law Society [2013] NZHC 83 the High Court considered whether or not Mr Hart’s transgressions were sufficient enough to suspend or cancel his registration. He had fa...

6. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief Steven James [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...residential developments, geotechnical stability assessments, hydro and wind power generation schemes, forensic assessments, and quarry developments. Through my local and overseas experience, I provide specialist skills in developing practical and cost-effective civil engineering solutions for complex public and private projects. Areas of expertise include earthworks and sediment control measures, and stormwater management. 4. My evidence covers civil engineering aspects...

7. Baker - Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) (2015) 41 Tākitimu MB 281 (41 TKT 281) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...291 Decision [40] I consider that the Court does not have the jurisdiction to determine the claims as sought per s 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. The application is dismissed. [41] In the absence of submissions, I consider that costs should lie where they fall. If counsel takes a different view memoranda should be filed. Pronounced in open Court at 2.15 pm in Rotorua on the 21 st day of July 2015. L R Harvey JUDGE

8. Gisborne District Council v Hautapu - Tatarahake No.1 (2015) 50 Tairawhiti MB 199 (50 TRW 199) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...this matter has been before the Court. [38] Finally, while there has been some support from the community, they do not own the land. The owners do. Order [39] Taking into account the Preamble ss 2, and 17, the application is dismissed and costs are to lie where they fall. Pronounced in Open Court at 1pm in Gisborne on this 27 th day of July 2015. C L Fox DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE

9. Chief Executive, Ministry for Culture and Heritage - Tāonga Tūturu found at Plimmerton (2012) 283 Aotea MB 166 (283 AOT 166) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...finding the heitiki is to be acknowledged appropriately in any documentary record relevant to its history but the detail and extent of that recognition will be a matter for the parties to consider in due course. [36] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced in open Court at 2.15 pm in Rotorua on this 4 th day of May 2012 L R Harvey JUDGE

10. [2014] NZEmpC 201 Dunn v Waitemata DHB [pdf, 128 KB]

    ...Dunn for medical incapacity (and the process that it followed) was what a fair and reasonable employer would have done in the circumstances. [45] The plaintiff’s claim is accordingly dismissed. [46] It may be that the parties can agree costs without further recourse to the Court. If that does not prove possible the defendant is to file any memoranda together with supporting material within 30 days of the date of this judgment with the plaintiff filing and serving within a...