Search Results

Search results for costs.

17506 items matching your search terms

  1. David Bain appendices tabs F to J [pdf, 1.9 MB]

    Ta F BETWEEN J U STICE IAN BINNIE Interviewer AND MILTON WEIR I nterviewee Date of I nterview: 1 9 Ju ly 20 1 2 Place: John Wickliffe House, Duned in Attendees Annabel Markham (Crown Law Office) INTERVIEW OF MILTON WEI R ( IN RESPECT OF C LAIM FOR COMPENSATIO N BY DAVID CULLEN BAIN) BINNIE J : Good morn ing M r Weir. M R WEIR: Good morning. 5 BINNIE J : Thank you for coming, I appreciate it. I have here a bible and if you wou ld swear in answer to the q

  2. Waitangi Tribunal - District 12 Wellington District [pdf, 13 MB]

    RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 12 WELLINGTON DISTRICT: PORT NICHOLSON, HUTT VALLEY, PORIRUA, RANGITIKEI, AND MANAWATU DR ROBYN ANDERSON AND KEITH PICKENS AUGUST 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh

  3. [2011] NZEmpC 149 NZPFFU ors v NZ Fire Service Commission [pdf, 158 KB]

    ...“everything it reasonably could to actively engage with the union and the two affected staff members”. That finding was not at issue in the case before me. [41] The plaintiffs have failed in their challenge and the claim is dismissed. If costs are sought and cannot be agreed upon, Mr Davenport is to file a memorandum within 21 days and Mr Meikle is to have a like period in which to respond. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 10.30 am on 21 November 2011...

  4. [2010] NZEmpC 156 Raukura Hauora o Tainui Trust v Nathan [pdf, 53 KB]

    ...rate plus two percent as from 29 February 2008 down to the date of payment. A memorandum (which could be part of a memorandum filed under [43]) showing the interest calculation is to be filed for approval. [43] The plaintiff is entitled to costs and, failing agreement, a memorandum should be filed within 21 days and Ms Nathan will then have a further 21 days in which to file a memorandum in response. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 10.30 am on 30 November 2010...

  6. [2010] NZEmpC 62 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 63 KB]

    ...statutory personal grievance rights available to employees under Part 9 of the Act. [56] The plaintiff’s challenge to the Authority’s determination succeeds and it is set aside. AFFCO’s so-called trial employment agreement is unlawful. [57] Costs on this challenge are reserved for consideration by the parties themselves in the first instance but, if they cannot agree, by memorandum to be filed and served by the plaintiff within two calendar months of the date of this judgment...

  8. [2012] NZEmpC 220 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...penalties, where so many issues were legitimately arguable. This was in the nature of a test case and it was heard as a matter of urgency with the full co-operation of the defendant. For these reasons, the claim for penalties is dismissed. [52] Costs are reserved. If they cannot be agreed they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda, the first of which is to be filed and served by 4 pm on Friday 8 February 2013. Any memorandum in response should be filed and served by...

  9. Millward & Anor v CAC304 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...worked for him; [c] To appease them, Mr Cozens offered to forgo the administration fee and deduct the GST component, which he then reneged on after the sale when his office would not allow him to do this; and [d] Mr Cozens presented a “sell at all costs” outlook from the start. [47] Mr Cozens in response has stated that he never put any undue pressure on the complainants, and by way of support for this position has referred to: [a] The text messages between himself and Mrs Millw...