17505 items matching your search terms
...single cent in fees for all the work that I did for him and his 9 Above n 2. 12 family.”10 [66] Mr and Mrs AI vigorously denied the Practitioner’s claim that they had not paid fees and costs. They claim to have paid not only the application fees for various applications for family members, but also the professional fees charged by the Practitioner. They said all payments were made in cash. [67] At the review hearing...
...directions. In the meantime, and for the reasons stated above, I am not persuaded that the tests for the issue of an injunction have been satisfied. Decision The application for injunction is dismissed. Counsel may wish to exchange memoranda as to costs. These orders are to issue immediately, per r 7.5, Māori Land Court Rules 2011. Pronounced at 10.05 am in New Plymouth on Wednesday this 20th day of December 2017. L R Harvey JUDGE
...licensed immigration adviser had primary responsibility for the client relationship. [83] The Code is prescriptive in requiring actions to occur at the commencement of the client engagement. As a minimum: [83.1] Before commencing work the basis for costs and fees must be established (clause 8). [83.2] A written agreement is required (clause 1.5). [83.3] Clients must be made aware of the terms and significant matters relating to that agreement (almost inevitably including their immigr...
...interest of €1,749.44. The bank may continue to debit this account on a monthly basis and I suggest it would be in your best interest to try to resolved (sic) this issue with the bank at an early stage rather than let it drag on and perhaps be more costly to you than you anticipated. [19] That report was considered by Standards Committee [B] which determined pursuant to s 130(c) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act to conduct an investigation into the matter. The letter giving no...
...one licensed immigration adviser has been in a position where his professional registration could not be renewed in another country because a complaint of dishonesty had been referred to the Tribunal with no factual support at all. [81] It is also costly and distressing for advisers to have to respond to such complaints. Furthermore, advancing complaints without evidence may well divert complainants from providing the probative evidence they do not appreciate is necessary to support thei...
...of its locatioll . [have 11 0 illtelltioll of livillg in the Hokiallga 1I0W or ill the fillure. My childrell alld extellded fa lllily have expressed 110 illterest ill the lalld at all alld agree that it is ofllo use to us. The place has becollle costly to lIIailltaill alld ill gelleral has becollle a burdell to lIIe as [live alld work ill Aucklalld alld Illy childrell are at school here. As 110 olle lives 011 the property alld it is opell to trespassers alld burglars. [II short I wish t...
...concerned with and the tribunal is not persuaded that Ms Li should be entitled to provide further evidence on this issue after the event. Conclusion [54] Each of the applications is dismissed. There will be orders accordingly. The question of costs relating to this application can be the subject of submissions following the hearing of the appeal. Leave is reserved to the parties to seek additional directions if required. 2018 NZREADT 10 - Li - Ruling [55] Pursuant to s 1...
...unexplained in submissions. [83] Dr Sawyer has failed to establish that these documents are relevant and admissible. Outcome [84] None of the categories satisfies the test for disclosure in the regulations. The application is dismissed. [85] Costs are reserved. K G Smith Judge Judgment signed at 4.55 pm on 23 March 2018.
...expansion in investment needs to be preceded by rigorous research to better understand whether, how, and in what circumstances offender treatment is effective at reducing family violence. EVIDENCE BRIEF SUMMARY Evidence rating: Fair Unit cost: Corrections: $1,700 per person referred to a contracted programme MOJ/MSD: variable Effect size (number needed to treat): Latest results from Corrections suggest that for every 24 people attending a programme one fewer...
...[57] Counsel for Mrs Kahukiwa-Smith is invited to file submissions on whether his client should serve out a period of ineligibility for reappointment to the trust within two months from the date of this judgment. [58] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced at 1.15pm in Levin on Thursday this 19th day of July 2018 L R Harvey JUDGE