Search Results

Search results for costs.

17502 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZACC 16 - Scott v ACC (14 January 2021) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...proven that the decision by the respondent of 5 July 2016 declining to fund the L4/5 decompression and intertransverse fusion surgery was wrong. That decision is therefore quashed and the appeal is allowed. [62] Should there be any issue as to costs, counsel have leave to file memoranda in respect thereof. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: P Sara, Barrister and Solicitor, Dunedin for the appellant Young Hunter, Christchurch for the r...

  2. Yuile v Smith - Tuahu 6 (2022) 112 Tairawhiti MB 20 (112 TRW 20) [pdf, 320 KB]

    ...Tuahu 6 block in favour of the applicant is dismissed. [44] The application to determine ownership of the homestead located on the Tuahu 6 block is dismissed. [45] Archie Smith was represented by counsel. Counsel is to file any memoranda as to costs by 15 July 2022. The applicant is to file any response by 29 July 2022. I whakapuaki i te 4.00 pm i Te Whanganui-a-Tara, rua tekau mā toru o ngā rā o Pipiri i te tau 2022. D H Stone JUDGE

  5. [2022] NZACC 107 - Carmichael v ACC (7 June 2022) [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...weekly compensation in its decision of 5 January 2018. The matter of weekly compensation is remitted back to the Corporation to ascertain the exact period of incapacity and the amount of compensation involved. [54] Mr Carmichael is entitled to costs. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors for the Appellant: Schmidt and Peart Law. Solicitors fo...

  6. [2022] NZACC 156 – Chalmers v ACC (16 August 2022) [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...made out, this Court would not have exercised its discretion to grant leave, so as to ensure the proper use of scarce judicial resources. This is because this Court is not satisfied as to the wider importance of any contended point of law. [42] Costs are reserved. Judge P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: ACC Employment Law, Auckland for the appellant Medico Law, Auckland for the respondent 8 See n5 Ng [2020] 2 NZLR 683, at [69]. 9 See n1 Chalmers, a...

  7. [2022] NZACC 80 – Jamieson v ACC (6 May 2022) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...supraspinatus tendon in Mr Jamieson’s left shoulder are causally linked to his accident injury in January 2020. [54] This appeal is therefore allowed, and the review decision of 11 January 2021 is set aside. [55] Mr Jamieson is entitled to costs and/or disbursements. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors for the Corporation: Medico Law....

  8. [2021] NZACC 183 – Butler v ACC (16 November 2021) [pdf, 340 KB]

    ...in this case is proved on the balance of probabilities. [71] The appeal is allowed and the Corporation’s decision of 3 August 2017 declining claims for cover for cervical pathology is reversed. [72] The appellant has sought the payment of costs being $189 for accommodation, $24 for a return train ticket and $10.79 for photocopying. These are allowed. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: Meredith Connell, Wellington for the respondent...

  9. [2022] NZACC 162 — Folkema v ACC (18 August 2022) [pdf, 273 KB]

    ...Court would not have exercised its discretion to grant leave, so as to 15 ensure the proper use of scarce judicial resources. This Court is not satisfied as to the wider importance of any contended point of law. [43] There is no issue as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge

  10. Rapatini v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal injury Deemed Decision) [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...decision dated 4 November 2020 declining cover for Ms Rapatini’s back sprain, lumbar sprain and postural scoliosis. The decision of the Reviewer of 22 March 2021 is therefore upheld. This appeal is dismissed. [50] I make no order as to costs. [51] In making the above decision, this Court records its sympathy for Ms Rapatini’s sense of frustration in relation to her dealings with the Corporation. This Court notes that are two areas where the Corporation’s conduct appears...