Search Results

1. Weber v CAC20002 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 22 [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...which states (in part): “When inviting signature of an agency agreement a licensee must explain to a prospective client in writing – (a) The conditions under which commission must be paid and how commission is calculated, including an estimated cost (actual $ amount) of commission payable to the client, based on the appraised price of the land or business. …” [36] We observe that an appraised price for listing purposes is a different concept from an appraisal under Rule 9.5....

2. [2014] NZEmpC 49 Patel v OCS Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...information that subsequently came to the company’s attention would have reinforced the conclusions I would otherwise have reached in relation to remedies, if they had been in issue. Result [61] The plaintiff’s challenge is dismissed. [62] Costs are reserved at the request of both parties. If they cannot otherwise be agreed the defendant is to file and serve a memorandum and supporting material within 30 days of the date of this judgment with the plaintiff filing and serving...

3. Rudolph v Reti - Otetao B3A2 [2011] Māori AppellateCourt MB 143 (2011 APPEAL 143) [pdf, 725 KB]

   ...road frontage to Russell Road. The balance of the block lies to the west of the river and could be developed once a vehicle crossing of the river has been constructed. Such development is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future due to the cost of construction of a bridge or other suitable vehicle crossing. [4] Otetao B3A1 is a marae and recreation reserve. The marae reserve divides the eastern portion of Otetao B3A2 into northern and southern areas. [5] Ronald Reti applied fo...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 139 Dean v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...base salary and allowances for those hours, for 131 days. [81] I reserve leave to the parties to apply to the Court if there are any remaining quantum issues. [82] This judgment replaces the determination of the Authority. [83] Mr Dean seeks costs. As he has succeeded on his challenge, my provisional view is that he should receive those, calculated on a Category 2, Band B basis. However, if the parties are unable to reach agreement on this topic, an application is to...

5. [2017] NZEmpC 141 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...Guru is ordered to pay Mrs Lewis this sum as compensation pursuant to s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act. [46] As Mrs Lewis was represented by her husband in the proceedings and was therefore not legally represented, she is not entitled to any award of costs. However, Immigration Guru is to reimburse Mrs Lewis for filing fees which she paid in both the Authority and the Court proceedings. M E Perkins Judge Judgment signed at 3 pm on 10 November 2017...

6. AB v FT LCRO 008/2015 (30 June 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...Collude with the landlord’s lawyers to sabotage the case before the High Court and Court of Appeal before it could get to arbitration; Mr FT was already in the process of sabotaging the forthcoming arbitration. • That collusion led to an award of costs in favour of the landlord which was a fraud on EFG. • Defrauding Mr and Mrs AB of their personal assets. [13] The substantial complaint document addresses each of these allegations by reference to the pleadings filed in the motel...

7. Chand and Kumari v Prakash [2012] NZIACDT 85 (3 December 2012) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...situation where they are practising under supervision while they hold a provisional licence. [55] Other possibilities such as training, and specified conditions, are more relevant to competence issues. There are also powers relating to imposing costs and compensation liabilities for misconduct. [56] In this decision I am satisfied the range of possibilities to weigh are: [56.1] cancellation of Mr Prakash’s licence and a prohibition on reapplying for a licence; [56.2] cancellation...

8. AN v TC LCRO 381/2013 (4 August 2015) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...is appropriate to the circumstances. A censure is therefore imposed pursuant to s 156(1)(b) of the Act. [69] Taking into account all of the circumstances, I do not consider it is necessary to impose a fine, or to make any orders including as to costs. Paragraph 25 [70] Given the Committee had already decided that further action was not necessary or appropriate, paragraph [25] was not part of the decision. It is unrelated to the propriety of Mr TC’s conduct, and to the exercise...

9. EV v IG LCRO 111/2013 (8 September 2015) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...pleaded guilty to the charge of driving with excess blood alcohol. The Police withdrew the careless driving charge. Mr IG’s blood alcohol reading was 144mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood (the limit being 80/100). He was fined $1,050 together with costs and expenses, and disqualified from driving for six months (which is the minimum period of disqualification able to be imposed). [16] As part of its investigation the Standards Committee obtained copies of the information and th...

10. BORA Customs and Excise Bill [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. The Bill 9. The Bill revises the principal Act, following a review of that Act. The general modernisation of the principal Act is expected to reduce compliance costs and improve accessibility. In particular, the Bill: a. supports the movement of goods, people and craft into and out of New Zealand b. modernises Customs’ revenue system, clarifying businesses’ obligations c. confirms most of Cust...