Search Results

1. The Proprietors of Maraeroa C v NZ Forest Products Ltd (2007) 121 Waikato MB 258 (121 W 258) [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   ...against CHH, Hancock and Taumata pending the outcome of the arbitration process. Upon that process being concluded the applicants may apply to the Court to continue these remaining claims if they so wish. [71] If any party wishes to apply for costs such submissions must be filed and served within 14 days. Any submissions in reply are to be filed and served 7 days thereafter. this .22~aYOf 2007 19

2. Harris v Harris - Mangamuka West 3B2A and East H5B (2001) 28 Auckland MB 167 (28 AT 167) [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...considered view that the allegations were improperly made. Conclusion It follows thal the application under s.19(1)(a) is declined. While I am aware that the applicant Is-legally aided, it doas seem to me that this is a matter In which an award of costs which takes proper account of both the success of the respondent and the modest means of the applicants. would be appropriate. If counsel are unable to - . a9ree a figure, then submissions will be filed by the respondent within one month...

3. [2021] NZACC 22 - Yeo v ACC (2 February 2021) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...1 July 2013 to be a fair one. [95] Accordingly, I must find that Mr Yeo has failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that this decision was wrong, and dismiss the appeal. ACR 381-17-Yeo [96] Should there be any issue regarding costs, counsel have leave to file memoranda in respect thereof. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: Peter Sara, Barrister and Solicitor, Dunedin for the appellant Young Hunter, Christchurch for the r...

4. [2021] NZACC 4 - Ross v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...independent (with the result that the weekly compensation for her personal injury ceased) was not flawed either in process or substance. The decision of the Reviewer of 3 February 2015 is upheld. This appeal is dismissed. [77] I make no order as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors: Medico Law, Auckland for the respondent

5. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence- John Craig [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...records of the numbers of different species present and the flying heights they have been seen using. Where very large numbers of birds are known to use the vicinity of larger proposed wind farms, vertical and horizontal radar has been used. The costs of this have been large. These numbers are then put into collision risk models to estimate the likely kill rate. Many consents have also included a need to monitor actual kill rates to verify the veracity of the predictions. 37. For...

6. INZ (Gilray) v Singh [2019] NZIACDT 53 (29 July 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...breaches arose from one underlying mistake and that there is overlap between them. There will be no double counting of violations in determining the sanctions. [91] A timetable is set out below. Any request for repayment of fees or the payment of costs or expenses or for compensation must be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis of the claim. Timetable [92] The timetable for submissions will be as follows: (1) The Registrar, the complainant and Mr S...

7. INZ (Calder) v Wong [2019] NZIACDT 44 (27 June 2019) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...false. They will also take into account the period of suspension of his licence. [96] A timetable is set out below. Any requests for training should specify the particular course suggested. Any request for repayment of fees or the payment of costs or expenses or for compensation must be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis of the claim. Timetable [97] The timetable for submissions will be as follows: (1) The Registrar, Immigration New Zealand and Mr...

8. Nikora v Te Uru Taumatua - Te Uru Taumatua Trust [2020] Maori Appellate Court MB 248 (2020 Appeal 248) [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...this case. Nevertheless, we make no formal finding here as the s 238 application is still before the lower Court. Hei te Mutunga Noa Iho - Result [67] The appeal is dismissed. [68] As the respondents did not appear there is no issue as to costs. I whakapuaki i te 12:00pm o te rā i Rātū te 23rd o ngā rā o Pipiri te tau 2020 C L Fox (Presiding) M J Doogan M P Armstrong DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE

9. [2020] NZREADT 38 - Barfoot v Real Estate Agents Authority (26 August 2020) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...entitled to credit in regard to that matter. [92] Taking those matters into account, we consider that the appropriate outcome in this case would be to impose a penalty of $3000 in place of the penalty which the committee imposed. No orders for costs have been sought so we will not make any. 24 That is, she was prohibited from drawing up contracts in her own right until she had six months experience [93] Pursuant to...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 51 O’Boyle v McCue [pdf, 298 KB]

    ...that particular assertion is specifically referred to elsewhere in the statement of claim.21 There is accordingly no need for an amendment which is to the same effect. Outcome [68] I dismiss both applications. [69] The plaintiffs are to pay costs to the defendant on a Category 2, Band B basis. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 1.00 pm on 28 April 2020 21 Statement of claim at para 23....