Search Results

1. [2015] NZEnvC 191 Tram Lease v Auckland Transport and Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2015] NZEnvC lq \ IN THE MATTER of 6 appeals under Section 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN AND AND TRAM LEASE LIMITED (ENV -2014-AKL-000057) First Appellants SAMSON CORPORATION LIMITED AND STERLING NOMINEES LIMITED (ENV-2014-AKL-000055) Second Appellant MEDIA WORKS HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2014-AKL-000058) Third Appellant STAMFORD PLAZA AUCKLAND (ENV-2014-AKL-000059) Fourth Appellant THE

2. Panuku Developments Limited Amended Proposed Conditions 18 July 2018 [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...and/or to take samples. Monitoring 10. The consent holder shall pay the Council an initial consent compliance monitoring charge of $10,000.00 (inclusive of GST), plus any further monitoring charge or charges to recover the actual and reasonable costs that have been incurred to ensure compliance with the consents. 11. The $10,000.00 (inclusive of GST) charge shall be paid prior to the commencement of construction and the consent holder will be advised of the further monitoring charge...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 34 Emmerson v Northland District Health Board [pdf, 908 KB]

   ...protection claim. Dr Emmerson drafted appropriate letters, telling family members they could easily manage without a lawyer, and stating that if they were happy with the arrangement, she would provide informal assistance. It is obvious that legal costs were saved. 7 She was also described as a Physical Health Nurse. [31] With Dr M’s knowledge, legal assistance was also provided to a senior colleague on the ward. [3...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 131 Wilson v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...______________________________________________________________ A: On the matters addressed in this decision, nothing in the RMA precludes capacity to consent the Proposal. B: Directions are made concerning remaining matters as to biosecurity. C: Costs are reserved, and a timetable will be set in due course if required. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................................

5. OIA-104954.pdf [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...information damage to courthouses. Specifically, you requested: 1. The number of instances where a member of the public has caused damage to a courthouse or courthouse amenities, what the person damaged and at which courthouse, and what the approximate cost of repair was for each incident, broken down by year between 2017 and 2022. 2. That information relating to damage where it hasn't necessarily been attributed to a member of the public but occurred within a public space of the c...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 29 Bunton v Garden City Helicopters Ltd [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...arrangements have terminated, that the real nature of their relationship was completely different. [85] For all these reasons, I conclude that this Court has no jurisdiction to deal with the plaintiff’s claims and they must be dismissed. [86] Costs are reserved and may, if they cannot be agreed, be the subject of an exchange of memoranda. Because of the difficulties that Christchurch practitioners 17 Ross-Taylor at [30]....

7. [2012] NZEmpC 79 Premier Events Group Ltd v Beattie [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...parties even after the matter is officially before the Authority. If unmeritorious claims are lodged in the Authority, but which could have been resolved by earlier discussion for instance, then the party lodging the claim may well have to bear the costs’ consequences of such a claim. [13] Because both the statute and the principles of long established case law allow a personal grievance to be raised by lodging a statement of problem in the Authority if such claim is served on t...

8. [2008] NZEmpC CC 9/08 Coffey v The Christchurch Press, a division of Fairfax NZ Ltd [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...reassurance that it would not happen again, a fair and reasonable employer was entitled to conclude that Mr Coffey’s misconduct on 9 March 2007 was sufficiently serious to warrant his dismissal on notice. [65] The challenge therefore fails. [66] Costs are reserved. If they cannot be agreed they may be the subject of an exchange of memoranda, the first of which is to be filed and served within 60 days of the date of this judgment. The memorandum in response may be...

9. Rihia v Te Runanganui o Ngati Hikairo - Lake Rotoaira Trust (2012) 287 Aotea MB 44 (287 AOT 44) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...to the owners for consideration by the Court. On receiving that evidence the Court may then issue further directions. [61] The present application for the appointment of trustees is concluded and dismissed. [62] There will be no order as to costs. Pronounced in open Court at 11.55 am/pm in Kaikohe on this 19 th day of July 2012. L R Harvey JUDGE

10. Thompson & Ors v CAC 20006 & Adams [2013] NZREADT 65 [pdf, 90 KB]

    ...issued; [c] If the vendor was not able to transfer clear titles within one year of the date of agreement, then the agreement was effectively at an end, with the deposit being forfeited to the purchaser and the vendor owing any additional building costs by way of a loan to the purchaser, together with interest (clause 22); 10 [d] Under clause 27, the purchaser was not permitted to register a caveat against the existing certificate of title, other than in the limited circumstan...