Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC CC 13A/07 Abernethy v Dynea NZ Ltd [pdf, 107 KB]

   ABERNETHY V DYNEA NEW ZEALAND LTD CHCH CC 13A/07 12 July 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH CC 13A/07 CRC 19/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN STEPHEN ABERNETHY Plaintiff AND DYNEA NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19 and 20 June 2007 (Heard at Nelson) Closing submissions filed and dealt with by telephone conference held on 3 July 2007 Appearances: Nicole Ironside, counsel for

2. [2011] NZEmpC 125 Angus v Ports of Auckland Limited [pdf, 160 KB]

   ANDREW ANGUS V PORTS OF AUCKLAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 125 [5 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 125 ARC 69/11 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for interim reinstatement BETWEEN ANDREW ANGUS Plaintiff AND PORTS OF AUCKLAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 4 October 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Simon Mitchell, counsel

3. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 10th-11th reports [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...employment as a result of restructuring. Changes had been introduced in December 1994 to increase the level of payments to purchase food in cases of emergency and hardship, to increase the level of grants for school uniforms and to provide grants to meet costs associated with the transition from receipt of benefit to resumption of employment. Since April 1995 supplementary benefits had been made available to a wider group of people on low incomes. Further adjustments had been made in the recent...

4. Guo v CAC304 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 35 [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...the licensees remains extant. [101] It is concerning that, at least prima facie (on the balance of probability), the complaints of Mr Guo seem to emanate from rather petty business rivalry. He is fortunate that the issue of him contributing to costs has not been raised. 18 [102] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________...

5. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Eichelbaum [2014] NZLCDT 68 [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...person closely involved seeking funding for litigation and as a lawyer, it is difficult to escape the proposition that this conduct is connected with the provision of such services. [30] Similarly, conduct which has arisen in attempts to recover his costs for his services, legal and otherwise, are also so intermingled as to be indistinguishable and must be seen as connected with the provision of legal services. [31] Thus we find that the proper section to be applied to each of the c...

6. Youth Court - 10 suggested characteristics of a good youth justice system [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...negative peer influence were reduced).56 In the justice context, Dodge, Lansford and Dishion recommend alternatives to incarceration and deviant group placement which involve family and community groups in the treatment of young people. Promising, cost-effective alternatives are Functional Family Therapy (FFT) and multi-systemic therapy (MST) The particular programme in question also succeeded in improving youth-adult relationships, increasing discipline, and enhancing supervision. 57...

7. LCRO 109/2015 RKX v SDC [pdf, 386 KB]

   ...was not entitled to have his fees paid from the [BANK] loan money that there was no necessity to consider what those fees “should have been”. The Committee’s orders included the requirement that Mr RKX repay the fees, and pay a fine and a costs order. Application for review [21] Mr RKX filed an application for review on 29 May 2015. He seeks a reversal of the Standards Committee’s decision. In support of his application he states that: Remuneration – authority to pay...

8. BORA Law Reform (Epidemic Preparedness) Bill [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not require the elimination of "minuscule" constitutional burdens, and 6 [1996] 2 NZLR 89 12 legislative action that increases the costs of exercising a right should not be invalidated if the burden is "trivial". 61. In addition, we note (while acknowledging the minor differences between section 14 of the Bill of Rights Act and section 2(b) of the Canadian C...

9. LCRO 45 and 46/2014 PO v RQ and FE [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...advice when he entered into the agreement, from either or both of Mr RQ and Mrs FE. [11] The issues identified by Mr PO were substantial, and meant that projected income from the business was significantly less than anticipated. There were also costs involved in remedying defects. [12] Mr PO estimated his losses from the purchase as being in the region of $150,000. [13] Within [HFE], Mr PO’s purchase file was predominantly managed by Mrs FE. She consulted with Mr RQ from tim...

10. Monschau v Bamber - Tahorakuri A No 1 Section 33A2 [2016] Maori Appellate Court MB 286 (2016 APPEAL 286) [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...further evidence and submissions should be 2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 307 heard, to conduct a hearing accordingly, and to make a final determination on any claims made by the appellants against the respondents. [80] Submissions as to costs from the appellants are to be filed with this Court within four weeks of the date of this decision. The respondents are to be file any response14 days after those submissions are served on them. The appellants are to file any reply sub...