17494 items matching your search terms
A LABOUR INSPECTOR v SAMPAN RESTAURANT LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 69 [21 June 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 37/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a referral of questions of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN A LABOUR INSPECTOR Plaintiff AND SAMPAN RESTAURANT LIMITED First Defendant AND YU OUYANG Second Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 23 February, 16 M
...relating to the penalty finding, which is reduced to $2,500. This sum is to be paid to the Registrar of this Court within 21 days. Half will then be paid to Ms Lowe, and half to the Crown account. [114] I make no award as to costs. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 3.10 pm on 21 March 2018
...provisions in the Operative Plan and the Proposed Plan as notified. (d) Such other orders, relief or other consequential amendments as are considered appropriate or necessary by the Court to address the concerns set out in this Appeal. (e) Costs of and incidental to the Appeal. 10. The Appellant attaches the following documents to this Notice of Appeal: DAA-105681-2-86-V1 7 (a) Plans identifying the part of Development Area 8 subject to this Appeal (Annexure A) . (b) A c...
...failed to have proper regard for the Panel's recommendations and reasons. 10. The Trust seeks the following relief: a. That the Decision be set aSide; b. That the Panels' recommendation to the Council be adopted and accepted; and c. Costs. 11 . An electronic copy of this notice is being served today by email on the Auckland Council at unitaryplan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. Waivers and directions have been made by the Environment Court in relation to the usual require...
...Wynyard Wharf are operationally required to have the same level as existing wharves. 7.21 Adaptation to SLR (and therefore coastal hazards) for the wharf structures will be based on the best practicable solution taking into account whole of life costs, the tenure and renewal of structures and their functional use. At this stage, it is proposed that the piles of a structure will be designed to include for a SLR of 1m, with the deck and wave panels being upgraded when the structures a...
SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION v NEW ZEALAND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE TE RIU ROA NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 100 [18 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 100 EMPC 122/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE TE RIU ROA Defendant Hearing: 4 August 2016 (heard at Wellington) App
...a direction made against the person for, the offence; or (c) served a sentence for, or complied with an order or a direction made against the person because of committing, the offence; or (d) was required to pay a fine or other money (including costs or any amount by way of restitution or compensation) on account of commit- ting, or being convicted of, or sentenced for, the offence; or 10 Criminal Records (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill Part...
...concerning his perjury complaint about Ms [J] accompanied by a response from the Police; and 2 December 2013 referring to Ms DC’s failure to call the three witnesses at the September 2010 ERA hearing. 17 (b) Her failure to follow his instructions cost him his job. (c) She did not advise him of the right of appeal from the ERA determination to the Employment Court. (d) He had not made a claim to the Human Rights Commissioner that “[[NZX]] deprived [him] of an entitlement...
...30 months, rather than just another visitor visa. 21 [117] A timetable is set out below. Any request that Ms Marica undertake training should specify the precise course suggested. Any requests for repayment of fees or the payment of costs or expenses or for compensation must be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis of the claim. Timetable [118] The timetable for submissions will be as follows: (1) The Registrar, the complainant and Ms Marica...
...stands out as a failing that they regarded as being unacceptable according to the standard in s 12(b). [93] In reality, it may not always be possible or necessary to prepare a written brief, or to have a client sign and date that. Expediency and cost might be factors that weigh against preparing a written brief in some circumstances, but those are far less likely to apply to the type of complex criminal matter in which Mr OX was instructed over a period of some months. There is...