Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 207 Waterfall Park Developments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...this can include the modifications identified and for the purposes given in this decision. Directions are made to allow parties to provide supplementary submissions and associated drafting for the purposes of the court’s final decision. D: Costs are reserved. REASONS Introduction [1] This decision is on Topic 31 in Stage 2 of the review of the Queenstown Lakes District Plan (‘PDP’). It concerns an appeal by Waterfall Park Developments Limited (‘WPDL’) against decis...

2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - 5th report [pdf, 386 KB]

   GE.08-40566 (E) 010908 UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/NZL/5 18 February 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Fifth periodic reports of States parties NEW ZEALAND∗ [24 December 2007] ∗ In accordance with the information transmitted to States

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000193 Kiwi Property Group Limited & Others v Auckland Council Consent Order [pdf, 19 MB]

   ...Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed subject to the amendments set out in Annexure A to this order; (2) the appeal is otherwise dismissed. [B] Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS I ntrod uction [1] This order relates to the resolution of the appeal by Kiwi Property Group Limited, Kiwi Property Holdings Limited and Sylvia Park Business Centre Limited (Appellants) against a decision by the Aucklan...

4. Public perceptions of the New Zealand court system & processes [pdf, 408 KB]

   ...measures in March 1999, February 2000, February 2001, February 2002, March 2003, March 2004, and March 2005. Specific aims are to look at perceptions regarding: • Availability of information about the courts • Time frame for delivery of services • Cost involved in using the courts • The manner in which the court process treats people • Provision of services to all New Zealanders • The importance of the court system to the New Zealand democratic process • How modern court s...

5. [2007] NZEmpC WC 29/07 Hawkins v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...perfing)1 because of the actions of the defendant. He seeks reinstatement, loss of salary from the date of disengagement to his reinstatement plus interest, reinstatement of his superannuation entitlements, compensation, annual leave entitlements, and costs. The defendant claims that the 1 Perf: Police Employment Rehabilitation Fund plaintiff’s personal grievance was raised out of time; that a police officer who has vo...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 80 Willis v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 84 KB]

   WILLIS V FONTERRA COOPERATIVE GROUP LTD WN 29 June 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 80 WRC 19/09 IN THE MATTER OF de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PHILLIP WILLIS Plaintiff AND FONTERRA COOPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 15 and 16 March 2010 20 April 2010 Appearances: Monica Singleton, counsel for the plaintiff John Rooney, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 29 Jun

7. [2015] NZSAAA 03, ( 11 March 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...and the Secretary before it, on reg 35(2) as the applicable provision. In the Ministry’s view reg 35(2) reflects the basic policy that: “The purpose of Student Allowances and student accommodation benefits is to assist students with their costs while they are engaged in active study at an institution. As a result, part of the general policy settings is a requirement that students support themselves during periods where they are on a vacation break (period longer than three weeks)...

8. M D Cottle Family Trust & Ors v Barnett [2015] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...have the ability to order reimbursement of the difference between the highest offer that the licensee is alleged to have kept from the complainants and the actual amount received from the sale; [d] The Committee saw no justification for reimbursing costs incurred by the complainants; [e] As no evidence was provided relating to a requested ‘public interest’ investigation, the Committee declined to make any orders; and [f] As the licensee had already admitted that neither an agency...

9. Waaka v Harrison - Poike 14 (Waimapu Marae) (2015) 101 Waikato Maniapoto MB 216 (101 WMN 216) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...on two separate occasions. Advertisement must appear in the Bay of Plenty Times, the first at least 28 days prior to the AGM. The second advertisement is to appear at least 21 days prior to the AGM. The marae trustees are responsible for the cost of the advertisements; 39 97 Waikato Maniapoto MB 269 (97 WMN 269). 101 Waikato Maniapoto MB 239 b) Nominations can be received from the floor. All nominees will be expected t...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 234 2015 AFT v BCM [pdf, 294 KB]

    AFT v BCM NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 [23 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 2/2015 IN THE MATTER OF of an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN AFT Applicant AND BCM Respondent Hearing: By memoranda of submissions and affidavits filed on 21 April, 25 May, 25 June, 14 and 20 July, 18 and 31 August, 14 September, 12 October and 3 November 2015 Appearances: