17489 items matching your search terms
1 Otago Regional Council Key Issues Report Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (Water Permits Plan Change) 9 October 2020 Author: Tom De Pelsemaeker 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….....3 Summary of the state of the environment in the Otago region ........................... 5 Summa
...natural order (e.g. responses ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”). For these types of responses, we tend to summarise at least two response categories. Stacking multiple response categories in a single graph comes at the cost of losing the ability to display confidence intervals for each category. However, the margin of error for all responses are provided in the data tables that accompany this report. Where appropriate, confidence intervals (at the 95% level...
...natural order (e.g. responses ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”). For these types of responses, we tend to summarise at least two response categories. Stacking multiple response categories in a single graph comes at the cost of losing the ability to display confidence intervals for each category. However, the margin of error for all responses are provided in the data tables that accompany this report. Where appropriate, confidence intervals (at the 95% level...
...Income Ki ha tokoni fakapa‘anga ke tokoni atu ki he ngaahi fakamole ‘o ha ‘apisia (‘e fakafuofua pē ki he tu‘unga ‘o ho‘o pa‘anga hū maí). Telefoni ta‘etotongi: 0800 559 009. Uepisaití: workandincome.govt.nz/eligibility/urgent-costs/bereavement 4 www.acc.co.nz/im-injured/financial-support/financial-support-after-death http://www.afterasuicide.nz/ https://www.govt.nz/organisations/births-deaths-and-marriages/ http://www.communitylaw.org.nz/ http://www.sands.org.nz/ ht...
...Project Notice of Requirement NoR 4b (Appendix B) do not require any amendments as a result of the amendment made to Condition 26 of NoR 4a made in A(1) above; and Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Background The project [1] Auckland Transport and New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) (together, the Requiring Authorities) are responsible for the designation, funding, 3 construction and operation of the Botany to Ai...
Summary of submissions Provision Submitter ID Submission Point ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Request to be heard Will consider joint case Further Submitter Number Further Submitter Name Support/oppose Policy 10A.2.2 70012 70012.01 Mervyn Mitchell Oppose Decline the plan change N Rule 10A.3.1.1 70012 70012.02 Mervyn Mitchell Oppose Decline the plan change N Schedule 10A.4.1 70012 70012.03 Mervyn Mitchell Oppose Decline the plan change N Schedule 10A
Ta A Privy Council Appeal No 9 0/2006 David Cullen Bain The Queen v. FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL Delivered the 10th May 2007 Present at the hearing:- Lord Bingham of Cornhill Lord Rodger of Earlsferry Baroness Hale of Richmond Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Sir Paul Kennedy [Delivered by Lord Bingham of Comhill] Appellant Respondent 1 . On 29 May 1995, following a trial before
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2016- IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for declarations under Part 12 of the Act ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED Applicant MACKENZIE DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent APPLICATION FOR DECLARATIONS BY ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED 17 November 2016 Counsel Acting: R B Enright / MCWright PO Box 91736 Victoria Street West Auckland 1142 E: madeleine@ed
...decision appealed are likely to significantly reduce the protection and restoration of indigenous biodiversity in the Auckland region. (c) The Council has failed to undertake an adequate assessment of the provisions, including the benefits and costs of the environmental, economic, social and cultural effects that are anticipated from the implementation of the provisions, as required by sections 32 and 32AA of the RMA. (d) The Panel recommended that the transferable rural site subdi...
...order to which the application relates, or by the Registrar. (2) On any application under this section, the Chief Judge may require the applicant to deposit in an office of the Court such sum as the Chief Judge thinks fit as security for costs, and may summarily dismiss the application if the amount so fixed is not so deposited within the time allowed. [29] Chief Judge Isaac summarised the principles to be applied in s 45 applications in the recent case of Mokena v Riwai Morg...