Search Results

1. Rec-Recap-2024-Q1-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 873 KB]

   ...area with an interest in this location include the private landowner/s and Waikato-Tainui (Iwi). VIII. For there to be appropriate signage and PRE placed at Crayfish Point the stakeholders will need to consult and discuss the placement and the cost. IX. On 22 February 2024, I attended a hui facilitated by Mahara Toka of Waikato-Tainui and also attended by Eru Whare the Chairman of Pukerewa Marae, mana whenua (people of the land). Mr Whare knows the area at Crayfish Point well. H...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 109 Shelby Park Ltd v Blackie [pdf, 186 KB]

   SHELBY PARK LIMITED V MARK RUSSELL BLACKIE NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 109 [11 July 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 109 ARC 29/10 IN THE MATTER OF challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SHELBY PARK LIMITED Plaintiff AND MARK RUSSELL BLACKIE Defendant Hearing: 4 and 5 April, 21 and 22 July and 13 September 2011 15 November 2011 by telephone conference call (Heard at Hamilton) Counsel: Eug

3. [2012] NZEmpC 142 Horton Media Ltd [pdf, 212 KB]

   HOOPER V COCA-COLA AMATIL (NZ) LTD NZEmpC CHCH [2012] NZEmpC 11 [2 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2012] NZEmpC 11 CRC 48/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KEITH HOOPER Plaintiff AND COCA-COLA AMATIL (NZ) LTD Defendant Hearing: 29, 30 November 2011 and 1 December 2011 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: Tim Oldfield, counsel for the plaintiff Mark Lawlor a

4. Mane - Waihou A8C1B1 (2015) 117 Taitokerau MB 215 (117 TTK 215) [pdf, 293 KB]

   117 Taitokerau MB 215 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20050001704 UNDER Section 214, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waihou A8C1B1 BETWEEN FRANK MANE Applicant A20050006012 UNDER Section 328, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waihou A8C1B1 AND BETWEEN BARNEY MANE Applicant Hearing: 31 March 2005 24 June 2005 23 August 2005 31 October 2005

5. Case study on forestry - Recommendations Recap issue 4 [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...practicable in the circumstances having regard to: • the harm that might occur • available knowledge about the likelihood of the harm occurring, the harm itself and what can be done to eliminate or reduce the harm • the availability and cost of means to do something about the harm. The Act also requires employers to keep records of and report all accidents. 4 If the death appears to have occurred when the deceased was in official custody or care an inquest is mandatory. (C...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Limited [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...investigatory procedures and meetings should generally proceed uninterrupted by challenges. It would undermine the evident purposes of s 179(5) and the Act more generally to allow or encourage challenges at a pre- determination stage, thereby increasing costs, reliance on legalities and technicalities, and generating delays. [18] Parliament’s intention in limiting the powers of the Employment Court in relation to the proceedings of the Authority is reflected in the Explanatory N...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 94 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC v AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 94 [17 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 152/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for interim injunction BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC First Plaintiff AND ROBERTA KEREWAI RATU AND OTHERS Second Plaintiffs AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant

8. [2015] NZEmpC 58 Hoff v The Wood Lifecare (2007) Limited Industries [pdf, 177 KB]

   DEBORAH HOFF v THE WOOD LIFECARE (2007) LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 58 [6 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 58 CRC 19/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEBORAH HOFF Plaintiff AND THE WOOD LIFECARE (2007) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 29, 30 September, 1, 2 and 3 October 2014 and 20, 21, 22 and 23 January 2015) (Heard at N

9. BORA Foreshore and Seabed Bill [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...whether setting reasonable limits on a protected right is justified. On its face, that involves a Brandeis brief inquiry where the Court undertakes an extensive empirical examination supported by economic, statistical, and sociological data, makes a cost-benefit analysis of the effects of various policy choices and chooses the solution which best reflects a balancing of the values involved."[36] 81. The first matters for consideration are the government's reasons for introducin...

10. Mane-Waihou A8C1B1 (2018) 169 Taitokerau MB 108 (169 TTK 108) [pdf, 602 KB]

    169 Taitokerau MB 108 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20050001704 UNDER Section 214, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waihou A8C1B1 BETWEEN FRANK MANE Applicant A20050006012 UNDER Section 328, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waihou A8C1B1 AND BETWEEN BARNEY MANE Applicant A20070004643 UNDER Section 289, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE