17481 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 70 ACR 38/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN M TE MIHA Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 21 September 2020 Heard at: Napier/Ahuriri Evidence completed: 4 February 2021 Appearances: Ms M Williams for the appellant Mr A Butle
...Protection Order (Sentencing Act), Child Protection Register, and 'committed to a facility on conviction') - no sentence recorded (includes where a person has been 'convicted and discharged' and where a person has been ordered to pay court costs). Gender, ethnicity and age Gender, ethnicity and age information originate from Police. 'Multiple ethnicity' information is used in this table. This means for each ethnicity a person is counted once per year (e.g.they may...
...dispute between the Lowes and the Crowes might have been avoided. The Committee concluded that the Lowes had had very poor service from Mr Harvey.12 [27] The Committee declined to make any order for rectification or relief, or that Mr Harvey pay costs to the Lowes.13 Appeal issues [28] Mr Harvey contended that in its substantive decision the Committee erred in finding that: [a] all registered owners were required to sign the agency agreement and agreement for sale and purcha...
...Invoke where necessary and appropriate the enforcement and emergency works procedures of the Resource Management Act to require the clean-up and restoration of the environment following any unauthorised discharge or spill, and for any associated costs to be met by the person or agency responsible for the discharge or spill; 6.5.22 Promote and encourage research into alternatives to the use of waste oil for suppressing dust; 6.5.23 Include a rule in this Plan which controls...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 005 ACR 267/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOSEPH JESSUP Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 December 2023 Held at: Auckland District Court/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: P Schmidt for the Appellant S Bisley for the Accident Co
...specimen of anything like a new or regular system of Maori settlement anywhere to be found in New Zealand ... There are also two water-mills in progress of erection. One of them, the property of the Catholic natives, is now nearly completed; the cost of which, I am told, will not be less than 800l. These two mills completed, they will be, in point of comfort and actual wealth, better off than any natives I know, and the consumption of flour much more general than it is now. They hav...
IMMIGRATION AND PROTECTION TRIBUNAL Rōpū Take Manene, Take Whakamaru PRACTICE NOTE 2/2025 (REFUGEE AND PROTECTION) 4 March 2025 PRACTICE NOTE 2/2025 (REFUGEE AND PROTECTION) PREAMBLE 1. COMMENCEMENT PRELIMINARY MATTERS 2. JURISDICTION 3. NOTICE OF APPEAL 4. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME 5. DEPORTATION APPEAL ON HUMANITARIAN GROUNDS 6. REPRESENTATION 7. CONTACT ADDRESS 8. FAMIL
...cases assigned to the team are effectively managed so that resource allocation decisions are appropriate and the quality standards for case management and court proceedings are maintained. • Managing case processing to ensure customer focused, cost effective and efficient delivery of court services. • Scheduling cases effectively and resolving issues as a result of last minute changes. • Contributing to the monitoring analysis and reporting on case management volumes, trends and...
PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 199 ACR 108/21; and 109/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN LD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPEN
...the significant extra fill required and this is a high-risk location and bunds would complicate the flow paths.” It also noted that “building treatment at Prouse homestead [was] unlikely to be viable.” Some of the mitigation options were costed by Waka Kotahi as follows: a) High performance road surface: $280/m (and Technical Report B – Appendix 3 Assessment Matrix assumed that only 585m of this surfacing would be required in Area G) b) Noise wall 3m high: $1,400/m; a...