Search Results

1. [2013] NZEmpC 98 Brake v Grace Team Accounting Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 28 and 29 May 2013 Memoranda filed on 20, 24, 27, 28 and 31 May 2013 Appearances: Warwick Reid, advocate for plaintiff Garry Pollak, counsel for defendant Judgment: 4 June 2013 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] At the conclusion of my substantive judgment issued on 13 May 2013, 1 I recorded that the plaintiff was entitled to costs and that if these could not be agreed they should be the subject of an excha...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 102 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...[2013] NZEmpC 102 [5 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 ARC 43/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CATHERINE TAN Plaintiff AND MORNININGSTAR INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION LIMITED T/A MORNINGSTAR PRESCHOOL Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 23 May and 4 June 2013 Appearan...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 19 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 19 [23 February 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 19 EMPC 392/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN RICHARD LEWIS (LABOUR INSPECTOR) Plaintiff AND SILVER FERN FARMS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed 13 and 22 September 2016 Appearances: C English, counsel...

4. [2020] NZREADT 13 - Beatson - Ruling on costs (1 May 2020) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...____________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ____________________________________________________________________ Background [1] The parties have now completed making submissions on the quantum of the costs order that the Tribunal might make in this proceeding. [2] We now briefly set out our views on the appropriate quantum of costs that ought to be awarded. [3] We accept that it is correct in principle that costs orders r...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 173 Gilbert v The Attorney-General in respect of the CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...October 2009 29 September, 20 October, 2 November, 24 November, 9 December 2010 9 February, 9 June 2011 Appearances: Plaintiff in person Joanna Holden and Roanna Chan, counsel for defendant Judgment: 5 October 2012 SUPPLEMENTARY COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] On 16 September 2010 the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment on Mr Gilbert’s appeal. 1 Neither party sought leave to appeal further and there is now no barrier to determining costs includi...

6. 2017 NZSSAA 063 (20 October 2017) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...G Pearson - Chairperson Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at XXXX on 20 and 21 March, 2017. Appearances For Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development: Mr XXXX, lawyer, MSD, XXXX. For the Appellant: Ms XXXX, XXXX. DECISION (COSTS AND ANCILLARY ORDERS) Background [1] The Authority issued its substantive decision in this matter on 5 May 2017 in SSAA Decision [2017] NZSSAA 20. The Authority allowed the appeal, determining that the Chief Executive’s decision tha...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 157 Pottinger and Nine Dot Consulting Ltd and Carew v Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...[2012] NZEmpC 157 [17 September 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 157 ARC 33/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN JANET POTTINGER First Plaintiff AND NINE DOT CONSULTING LTD Second Plaintiff AND KIRI CAREW Third Plaintiff AND KELLY SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed o...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 129 Metallic Sweeping (1998) Ltd v Ford [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...Paulsen, counsel for the plaintiff No appearance for the defendant Judgment: 30 September 2010 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] This case raises three interrelated issues. The first is how the Court can conduct a de novo hearing of a costs determination made by the Employment Relations Authority. The second is the extent to which the Court should call for information when a defendant fails to take any steps in the proceeding. The third issue is the manner and extent...

9. ED v VV LCRO 229 / 2010 (15 June 2011) - Costs Decision [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN ED of Auckland Applicant AND VV of Auckland Respondent DECISION AS TO COSTS [1] On 15 June 2011 I issued a decision in respect of the substantive matters in this review. The decision of the Standards Committee to take no further action in respect of the complaint by the Applicant was upheld. [2] Prior to t...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 29 Tourism Holdings Limited (trading as CI Munro) v Charlesworth [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...Plaintiff AND ANDREW CHARLESWORTH Defendant Hearing: Submissions filed on 24 June, 22 July, 1 and 2 August 2011 Judgment: 23 February 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff has challenged by way of a hearing de novo, a costs determination of the Employment Relations Authority issued on 1 February 2011. 1 In that determination, the Authority ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff $3,000 in costs, with no uplift on account of an offer made wit...