Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 011 Airbnb Australia PTY Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...District Plan as set out in Appendix 1, attached to and forming part of this consent order; (2) the appeals as they relate to Topics 29 and 30, subtopic 9 (Visitor Accommodation) is dismissed. B: Under s285 of the RMA, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns seven appeals by Airbnb Australia Pty Limited2 and others3 that were allocated to Topics 29 and 30, subtopic 9 – Visitor Accommodation. The appeals relate to provisions in chapte...

2. Māori Land Court - Rule 5.11 Schedule - May 2018 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 May 2018 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 May 2018, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori Appell

3. Evaluation of Parenting Through Separation programme [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...years should also be included in any figure of potential attendees. Providing a relatively inexpensive intervention at an early stage should also reduce the need for parents to use the Family Court in future, resulting in a significant saving in costs and reducing the likelihood of parental conflict. Early intervention should result in more parents being able to negotiate stable post-separation parenting arrangements, to the benefit of both parents and children. For example one study...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 022 Waikato Regional Council v Waikato District Council [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...(1) the appeal is allowed subject to the agreed clean version of amendments as set out in Annexure A to this order; and (2) the appeals are otherwise dismissed. B: Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] The appeals relate to a decision of Waikato District Council (WDC) on the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PWDP) in relation to the rezoning of land at Ohinewai. [2] On 24 May 2021, an independent hearin...

5. White v Potroz - Mohakatino Parininihi No 1c West 3A2 [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 143 (2016 APPEAL 143) [pdf, 479 KB]

   2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 143 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20150001176 APPEAL 2015/5 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against orders of the Māori Land Court made on 21 November 2014 at 328 Aotea MB 225-237 in relation to Mohakatino Parininihi No 1C West 3A2 BETWEEN HAUMOANA WHITE Appellant AND ANGELA HELEN POTROZ, JOHN EDWARD POTROZ AND BARRY STUART KING

6. Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust v Tane - Hauturu East 8 Block [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) [pdf, 226 KB]

   RUAPUHA AND UEKAHA HAPU TRUST V TANE MAC A20080016920 2 November 2010 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 2010 MAORI APPELLATE COURT MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) A20080016920 A20080016617 UNDER Section 59, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 8 Block BETWEEN RUAPUHA AND UEKAHA HAPU TRUST Appellant AND NORMAN TANE Appellant Coram: Judge A D Spencer Judge L R Harvey Judge D J Ambler Appear

7. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 65 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...recognise and respect tribal control and management of tribal lands. Those who sold land did so out of desperation : they were afflicted by disease and famine and were living in abject poverty. Their sale money was quickly consumed by basic survival costs. The sales were not even law­ ful , so in 1916 the Crown passed leg­ islation to retrospectively validate its purchases. The Tribunal found that the Crown breached the Treaty prin­ ciple of active protection by predatory purchas...

8. Ruapuha Uekaha Hapu Trust - Hauturu East 8 Block (2008) 134 Waikato MB 3 (134 W 3) [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...d) The trust would diversify its asset base aud income stream to better secure the future of the trust and its beneficiaries. [71] It was intended that the royalties from the caves be used entirely for capital investments, wlule payment of the costs of administration and distributions would be derived from the interest earned on the capital accounts. [72] The strategic plan was presented to the four whanau trusts which presently receive the distributions from the hust. Again Mr Doug...

9. Bristol v Ngāti Rangi Trust - Rangiwaea-Tāpiri [2017] Chief Judge's MB 269 (2017 CJ 269) [pdf, 435 KB]

   2017 Chief Judge’s MB 269 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20070002188 CJ 2007/007 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF RANGIWAEA-TĀPIRI (Formerly known as RANGIPŌ NORTH 8) – Application to Chief Judge BETWEEN RANGI BRISTOL, AIDEN GILBERT & MATIU HAITANA Applicants AND NGĀTI RANGI TRUST Respondent Hearings: 302 Aotea MB 51-64, dated 29 April 2013 326 Aotea MB 165-238, dated 25 August

10. [2016] NZEmpC 111 MUNZ v The China Navigation Co Pte Ltd [pdf, 505 KB]

    ...and, they say, on a ‘take-it-or-leave it’ basis, amount to an unlawful lockout of the second plaintiffs. They seek a declaration to this effect, an injunction preventing the defendant from continuing to lock out the employees unlawfully, and costs. It has been agreed that the application for injunction will not be pursued at this stage of the proceedings and that a declaration about whether there is a lockout will suffice to guide the parties to this dispute. [12] I should add...