Search Results

1. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v Campion [2019] NZLCDT 20 [pdf, 582 KB]

   ...to file any further submissions as to penalty within 14 days of the date of this decision. [92] Mr Campion may have a further 14 days to file his submissions on penalty. Mr Campion should set out his financial position so that the question of costs may be properly considered. DATED at AUCKLAND this 19th day of July 2019 Judge D F Clarkson Chair 19 Appendix 1 The S Complaint Charge 1 Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No.1 (Standard...

2. Mokaraka - Waima C8 (2019) Chief Judge's MB 1137 (2019 CJ 1137) [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...Hand Writing and Document Examiner to prove the letter concerning the family succession arrangement was true or false. (b) a Special Valuation would not be sought as: the potential advantages to be gained from doing so will not justify the cost or trouble involved. The house is in a bad state of disrepair. (c) on the house purchase and payment history of the mortgage: …. Errol Warren of HCNZ told me they had sent Tahi a letter regarding a Settlement Payment of $10,000 b...

3. LCRO 191/2019 UY v FB (26 November 2020) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...applications with the court alleging (in respect to her client) contempt of court, perjury, making false oaths and had sought directions from the court that her client be referred for prosecution, but these applications had been struck out and costs reserved in favour of her client; and (o) she denied allegation that she had not behaved courteously to Mr UY throughout; and (p) Mr UY’s complaint was frivolous and vexatious; and (q) Mr UY had misled the Standards Committee and...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 114 Summerset Villages Lower Hutt Limited v Hutt City Council [pdf, 31 MB]

   ...the 'long term' duration noise limits and the days and hours to which these apply. [39] Conditions that import by reference material from NZS must be clear on their face to all users of conditions. The copyright position of NZS and the cost of NZS means that we cannot assume that such fundamental documents are accessible to all. The substantive requirements of standards like noise limits should have been set out in full in the conditions circulated to the parties. (It is n...

5. Te Amo v Nicholas - Te Whaiti Nui A Toi Block (2020) 233 Waiariki MB 92 (233 WAR 93) [pdf, 387 KB]

   ...was from Reo Martin’s son Victor, who said his father and his father’s siblings also contributed to the purchase. However, I note that Phyllis Nicholas has attached receipts as evidence of her expenditure on the shed, maintenance and ongoing costs. While affidavits were filed by Reo Martin’s son and two of his friends, there is no concrete evidence of such claimed expenditure. Victor Martin did not give evidence in person and neither did any of the other whānau of Reo Martin...

6. [2021] NZACC 44 - Waite v ACC (17 March 2021) [pdf, 261 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 44 ACR 268/17 ACR 269/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GREGORY WAITE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 10 February 2021 Heard at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: Mr T Yates, advocate for the appellant Mr C Light

7. Inia v Julian [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 333 (2019 APPEAL 333) [pdf, 441 KB]

   2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 333 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20180008185 APPEAL 2018/18 UNDER Section 49, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against a decision of the Māori Land Court made on 3 September 2018 at 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 493-510 in respect of the Māori land interests of Moehuarahi Inia BETWEEN WHAEARANGI INIA, LARAINE IRITANA and MARILYN WHARETOROA INIA-MCGARVEY, as

8. [2019] NZEmpC 190 Maddigan v Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 304 KB]

   FRASER MADDIGAN v DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION [2019] NZEmpC 190 [17 December 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 190 EMPC 349/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FRASER MADDIGAN Plaintiff AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Defendant Hearing: 6-8 August 2019 (Hea

9. [2020] NZEmpC 43 A Labour Inspector v Matangi Berry Farm Ltd [pdf, 423 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR v MATANGI BERRY FARM LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 43 [16 April 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 7/2018 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN A LABOUR INSPECTOR Plaintiff AND MATANGI BERRY FARM LIMITED First Defendant AND JIUBO JIANG Second Def

10. Children and young people with charges finalised in the Youth Court June 2018 [xlsx, 310 KB]

    ...rehabilitation programme. • s283(c)-(j) monetary, confiscation, disqualification - the child/young person is ordered to return to court, if called upon within 12 months so that the court can take further action, such as ordering: payment of a fine, court costs, reparation or restitution, or forfeiture of property, or confiscation of a vehicle, or disqualification from driving. • s283(a)-(b) discharge, admonish - the child/young person is discharged without further penalty. Unknown gender,...