17466 items matching your search terms
...[10 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 220 EMPC 247/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN WELLINGTON FREE AMBULANCE SERVICE INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND HAYDEN GRAEME AUSTING First Defendant AND NICOLA MARIE GIBSON-HORNE Second Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by memoranda...
...Mathias and C M Sharp for Northland Regional Council M K Rashbrooke Date of Decision: 4 September 2023 Date of Issue: 4 September 2023 _________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS _________________________________________________________________ A: Under s 285 RMA, Mr Rashbrooke is ordered to pay Northland Regional Council the sum of $10,638.11 as contribution towards its costs. 2 B: Under s 285 RMA, M...
...July 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant B Marten for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 19 July 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs on review and other costs - ss 148 and 262(4), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 20 June 2022. The Reviewer declined jurisdiction in respect of:...
...By submissions filed on 10 February and 12 March 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Paul Blair, advocate for plaintiff Penny Swarbrick, counsel for defendant Judgment: 30 April 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS IN RELATION TO COSTS [1] The plaintiff brought an unsuccessful de novo challenge 1 against a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. The challenge involved a dispute as to the interpretation, application, and operation of terms in the col...
...[2018] NZEmpC 39 [3 May 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 39 EMPC 181/2017 EMPC 305/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of costs on discontinuance BETWEEN DIRECT AUTO IMPORTERS (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Defendant EMPC 182/2017 EMPC 306/2017 IN...
...NZEmpC 34 [29 March 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 34 EMPC 55/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN BARBARA TWENTYMAN Plaintiff AND THE WAREHOUSE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 31 January 2017 Appearances: P Swarbrick and M McGoldrick, counsel for defendant...
...Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 163 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs under s 285 of the Act BETWEEN MERVEBER LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000013) Appellant/Applicant (Respondent as to costs) AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent (Applicant as to costs) Court: Judge J A Smith (sitting alone pursuant to...
...Member Appearances: Counsel for the Committee: M Mortimer-Wang/M Clement The Complainant: No appearance The First and Second Respondents: R Hern/R Judd SUBJECT TO NON-PUBLICATION ORDER DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL AS TO COSTS Dated 8 May 2025 2 INTRODUCTION [1] On 27 July 2023, Complaints Assessment Committee 2205 (the Committee) found the First Respondent (Mr McLean) and the Second Respondent (Mr Knowles) (collectively “the licensees...
...Defendant Hearing: (on the papers dated 12 August and 14 September 2016) Appearances: D Jacobson, counsel for Mr F Pretorius K Patterson, counsel for Marra Construction (2004) Limited Judgment: 18 November 2016 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment deals with costs issues arising from two decisions. The first related to an unsuccessful application made by Mr Fredrick Pretorius to remove part of a relat...
...the Chief Executive DECISION Background [1] XXXX (further referred to as the appellant) appeals the decision made by the Chief Executive on 30 October 2015, upheld by a Benefits Review Committee on 8 June 2016, to remove vehicle running costs of $30 per week from his temporary additional support (TAS). [2] The appellant also appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive, upheld by a Benefits Review Committee, to not include landline and wiring telephone rental costs...