18159 items matching your search terms
...[2014] NZEmpC 71 [14 May 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 71 CRC 52/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of costs BETWEEN MARGOT ELIZABETH GAZELEY Plaintiff AND OCEANIA GROUP (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda filed by the plaintiff on 14 February 2014, by the defendant on 7 March 2014 and in reply by the pla...
...Respondent DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Section 27 4 Party Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Decision: 2 1 AUG 2019 Date of Issue: 2 1 AUG 2019 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON COSTS A. The Friends of Sherwood Trust is ordered to pay the sum of $5,000 to Auckland Council; B. The Friends of Sherwood Trust is ordered to pay the sum of $5,000 to the Director General of Conservation. The Friends of Sherwood Trust...
...L HARVEY LTD V DUNCAN CHCH 31 March 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2010] NZEMPC 36 CRC 5/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF a claim for costs BETWEEN T & L HARVEY LIMITED Plaintiff AND LEANNE DUNCAN Defendant Hearing: By memoranda received 17 and 28 December 2009 and 22 January 2010 Judgment: 31 March 2010 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] In my...
...BOOTH Plaintiff AND BIG KAHUNA HOLDINGS LIMITED Defendant ARC 84/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs and stay BETWEEN BRENDON RICHARD BOOTH Plaintiff AND BIG KAHUNA HOLDINGS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 21 February, 3, 4, 6 and 10 March 2014 Appearances: T Oldfield, counsel...
...CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 386/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN VMR First Plaintiff AND KRR Second Plaintiff AND WEN Third Plaintiff AND XDD Fourth Plaintiff AND AVIATION SECURITY SERVICE DIVISION OF CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY Defe...
...Mathias and C M Sharp for Northland Regional Council M K Rashbrooke Date of Decision: 4 September 2023 Date of Issue: 4 September 2023 _________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS _________________________________________________________________ A: Under s 285 RMA, Mr Rashbrooke is ordered to pay Northland Regional Council the sum of $10,638.11 as contribution towards its costs. 2 B: Under s 285 RMA, M...
...July 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant B Marten for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 19 July 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs on review and other costs - ss 148 and 262(4), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 20 June 2022. The Reviewer declined jurisdiction in respect of:...
...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 186 EMPC 337/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN TEDDY AND FRIENDS LIMITED Plaintiff AND PHILLIP PAGE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Schirnack and E Crowley, counsel for plaintiff E Hartdegen, counsel for defendan...
...[10 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 220 EMPC 247/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN WELLINGTON FREE AMBULANCE SERVICE INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND HAYDEN GRAEME AUSTING First Defendant AND NICOLA MARIE GIBSON-HORNE Second Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by memoranda...
...................................................................................................... 9 Further issues to be decided ............................................................................................................. 11 How should the Tribunal decide on the reasonable cost of repair? ............................................. 12 If the reasonable cost of repair amounts to 80% or more of the cost of a rebuild is IAG obliged to pay to rebuild? .....................