17477 items matching your search terms
...NZEmpC 102 [18 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 102 EMPC 113/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN SHANE ANDREW MERCER Plaintiff AND ROBERT LESTER MCINTYRE Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 20 June and 11 July 2016 Appearances: S Mercer, plaintiff in person J Reardon, co...
...10 Tairawhiti MB 121-136 (Heard at Gisborne) Counsel: Ms L Thornton, Counsel for the First, Second, and Third Applicants Mr A J Knowsley, Counsel for the Respondent Judgment: 4 April 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S R CLARK AS TO COSTS Solicitors: Tamaki Legal, Barristers & Solicitors, P O Box 259280, Botany 2163 Manukau Attention: Linda Thornton E-mail: linda@tamakilegal.com Rainey Collins, Solicitors, DX: SP20010, Wellington Attention: Alan Knowsley...
...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 51 EMPC 381/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN ALLAN GEOFFREY HALSE Applicant AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND TE WHATU ORA – HEALTH NEW ZEALA...
...Alternate Environment Judge LJ Newhook On the papers in Chambers in Auckland 23 December 2020 Date of Decision: Date of Issue: 2 7 MAY 2022 2 7 MAY 2022 Bay Wines Limited v Auckland Council 2 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS A: Mr and Mrs Poland, Ms Loranger and Ms Niemann's claim is upheld and they are awarded $412,770 to be paid by Cable Bay, and $82,554 to be paid by Auckland Council. B: Cable Bay's application is refused. C: Mr and Mrs Edw...
...Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 266 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for costs under s 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MCCALLUM BROS LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-121) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Judge A H C Warren Hearing: On the papers Last case e...
..._________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT _________________________________________________________________ A: Under s 285 of the RMA, Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust is ordered to pay costs to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga in the sum of $19,792.10, and costs to First Gas Limited in the sum of $15,573.90. 2 B: Under s 286 of the RMA, this order is enforceable in the District Court at New Plymouth. REASONS...
...M J Doogan Judge Te K Te A R Williams Kanohi kitea: Appearances J Kahukiwa for Appellant M Mahuika for Respondent Whakataunga: Judgment date 19 January 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Judgment of the Court as to Costs Copies to: J Kahukiwa, jkahukiwa@corbanrevell.co.nz, PO Box 21-180, Waitakere City. M Mahuika and T Paki, matanuku@kahuilegal.co.nz, tyler@kahuilegal.co.nz, PO Box 1177. mailto:jkahukiwa@corbanrevell.co.nz mailto:ma...
...Section 27 4 Parties Court: Chief Environment Court Judge DA Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: 17 May 2021 Date of Decision: 2 7 MAY 2021 Date of Issue: 2 7 MAY 2021 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991 the Environment ox Property Investments Limited v Auckland Council 2 Court orders Box Property Investments Limited to pay $100 to each of Reydon Place Residents Association Inc....
...(247 TTK 27-70), at 63. 2 247 Taitokerau MB 27-70 (247 TTK 27-70), at 64. 3 238 Taitokerau MB 7 (238 TTK MB 7). 4 247 Taitokerau MB 27-70 (247 TTK 27-70). 248 Taitokerau MB 216 [5] Mr Sanson, on behalf of the liquidators for SSKL, seeks costs against Mr Te Whata personally. The Attorney-General and Commissioner of Inland Revenue do not seek costs. This decision determines the following issues: (a) Should I award costs? (b) Should I award costs against Mr Te Whata perso...
............................................................................................ [16] Judge Harvey’s decision of 9 September 2011 .................................................... [23] The 2009 applications continue ........................................................................... [27] Judge Harvey’s costs decision of 7 July 2014 ..................................................... [36] Arguments on appeal .........................................................