18182 items matching your search terms
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 126 CRC 22/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN WILLIAM STUART CLARK Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 8 October 2013 and 13 May 2014 Representatives : D Pine, counsel for plaintiff P McBride,...
...11 [16 February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 11 EMPC 235/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN TITOKI SECURITIES TRUST Plaintiff AND SHARON WALLACE Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 6 and 29 January and 10 February 2016 Appearances: P Swarbrick, counsel for pl...
...NZEmpC 22 [14 February 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 22 ARC 46/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN CANDYLAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND JO-ANNE JARVIS Defendant Hearing: By submissions dated 28 November, 5 December, 10 December and 1 January 2014 Appearances: Michele Coker, agent for...
...CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 7 EMPC 324/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN CANTERBURY WESTLAND KINDERGARTEN ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND JANE ROSEMARY BARNES Defendant AND NZEI TE RIU ROA Intervener AND SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Intervener...
...its decision, the Court indicated that Mr Herrett was entitled to costs on his application, noted that costs ought to be able to be agreed, and permitted him to apply for costs within 21 days of the date of the judgment if necessary.2 1 Herrett v Eco Frame and Mirror Ltd [2023] NZEmpC 184. 2 At [33]. [2] Unfortunately, the parties were unable to agree concerning the issue of costs. Mr Herrett applied for costs on 20 November 2023.3 He seeks costs of $3,824 on a...
...(ENV-2018-CHC-123) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 21 December 2020 Date of Issue: 21 December 2020 DECISION AS TO COSTS A: Under s285, RMA 1, Queenstown Lakes District Council is ordered to pay to Trojan Holdings Limited and Skyline Enterprises Limited jointly costs of $40,000. B: Under s286, RMA, this order may be filed in the District Court at Queenstow...
...KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZEmpC 220 EMPC 72/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN VERY NICE PRODUCTIONS LIMITED Plaintiff AND GEORGIE ORMOND Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M Thomas, representative for plaintiff A Mapu, advocate for defendant Judg...
...& ANOR AK AC 9/07 23 February 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 9/07 ARC 46/06 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND TRAMWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES UNION INCORPORATED First Plaintiff AND NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION UNION INCORPORATED Second Plaintiff AND TRANSPORTATION AUCKLAND CORPORATION LIMITED AND CITYLINE (NEW Z...
...Haines QC, Chairperson Dr JAG Fountain, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr D Lohr in person Mr PA McBride and Ms FM Lear for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 8 and 9 September 2016 DATE OF DECISION: 29 September 2016 DATE OF COSTS DECISION: 17 November 2016 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS APPLICATION BY DEFENDANT1 BACKGROUND [1] In its decision in Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZHRRT 31 given on 29 September 2016 the Tribunal found...
...relevant time the specified maximum was $2,280.72. Ministry’s position 11. It is useful to set out the Ministry’s position first as Ms XXXX’s case responds to this. 12. The Ministry maintains that the funeral grant is limited to costs directly associated with burial of the deceased and does not extend to include the cost of kai at tangihanga or funeral. It relies on its longstanding Funeral Grant policy which, for reasons discussed below, the Ministry contends is c...