17502 items matching your search terms
...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 165 EMPC 98/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND COMPLIANCE AND REPAIRS LIMITED Plaintiff AND HIMANSHU MISTRY Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: I Axenov, agent of plaintiff G Finnigan and J Anse...
...Introduction [1] Mr Harder was found guilty of one charge of misconduct by a majority of the Tribunal on 29 July 2022. Following a penalty hearing, the Tribunal made orders censuring the practitioner and awarding a proportion of the two costs orders against him. [2] This decision provides the reasons for those orders. Scope of matters to be determined [3] The scope was limited because, for reasons we shall outline, the Standards Committee properly and fairly accepted...
...estimated the cost of being appointed replacement trustee for C+M Finance, but it has no experience of acting as trustee for a failed finance company. Not being able to consult trustee companies means that we have no detailed information about the actual costs of acting for failed finance companies.
...December 2010 (13 Waiariki MB 205-235) 16 October 2009 (348 Rotorua MB 21-45) (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: Ian Peterson, counsel for the applicant Frank Hogan, counsel for the respondents Judgment: 20 September 2011 JUDGMENT AS TO COSTS OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE CL FOX Solicitors: Mr Ian Peterson, Potts & Hodgson, PO Box 444, Opotiki 3162 Email: ian@pottshodgson.co.nz Mr Frank Hogan, Dykes Road, Karaka, RD 1, Papakura, Auckland Email: F...
...pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DH Applicant AND EI (deceased) Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY DECISION AS TO COSTS Introduction [1] On 12 May 2017, I issued a decision (the decision) in which I confirmed the determination by [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to take no further action in respect of Mr DH’s conduct prior to the issu...
...Ellen France and Stevens JJ Counsel: Applicant in person N E Flint for Respondent Judgment: 30 August 2010 at 2.30 pm JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. B The applicant must pay the respondent costs for a standard application on a band A basis together with the usual disbursements. ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by Stevens J) Introduction [1] For...
...On the papers Appearances: Mr B Hinchcliff for the appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar for the respondent Judgment: 3 February 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE AS TO COSTS ____________________________________________________________________ Background [1] On 5 December 2018 and 6 May 2019, the appellant through his GP sought cover for urethral stricture and damage to the ureter. [2] On 6 September 201...
...withdrawn with the leave of the Tribunal. [3] That finding, and the granting of leave can be formally recorded at this point. [4] What remained for consideration then was a claim for compensation, sought by the Standards Committee, and the issue of costs overall in respect of the two matters. [5] Further discussions confirmed that the Standards Committee were no longer seeking to pursue the compensation claim, and it was accepted that, given the matter was strongly contested by...
...FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND ARGON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BERNARD MOHAN Third Respondent AND PAUL BAYER (Removed) Fourth Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: S Pezaro BACKGROUND [1] On 8 October 2008 I granted applications for strike out by the first respondent, Argon Construction Limited’s (“Argon”), and the second respondent, Auckland City Council (“the Cou...
...Gretchen Stone, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 February 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The plaintiff challenges a compliance order 1 issued by the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) in relation to an earlier costs award 2 against her. The challenge is brought on a de novo basis. There is some urgency attaching to these proceedings as the plaintiff is required, in terms of the compliance order made by the Authority, to make payment of the o...