18182 items matching your search terms
...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 15 EMPC 147/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN STEVEN JOBBITT Plaintiff AND 4 SEASONS INDOOR OUTDOOR LIVING (2014) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: W Reid, advocate for plaintiff A Sharma, counsel for...
...Respondent AND JOE KAUKAS Fourth Respondent AND DAVID JOHN EDWARD Fifth Respondent AND JOHN PILCHER (Removed) Sixth Respondent Decision: 29 September 2010 COST DETERMINATION Adjudicator: K D Kilgour Page | 2 COSTS APPLICATION [1] Counsel for the sixth respondent, Mr John Pilcher, has applied to this Tribunal seeking an award of costs against the third respondent, Mr Mike Russell. BACKGROUND [2] The proceedings were issued by the clai...
...DESMOND NOEL BARNES Third Respondent AND MASTER BUILD SERVICES LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND PLASTER SYSTEMS LIMITED Fifth Respondent Decision: 16 February 2012 COST DETERMINATION Adjudicator: K D Kilgour COSTS APPLICATION BY AUCKLAND COUNCIL [1] The Council was removed from this proceeding on 10 September 2010 in Procedural Order No 7. [2] The claimants appealed that determination and also judicially reviewed the Eligibility Decision...
...Court: Judge J A Smith sitting alone pursuant to s279 of the Act and s285 Submissions: J K and H E Schwartfeger for themselves M G Conway and S K Lenin for Northland Regional Council Date of Decision: 18 July 2019 Date of Issue: 18 July 2019 COSTS DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Northland Regional Council is to pay to Mr and Mrs Schwartfeger the sum of $3,257.05 in payment of their disbursements including legal fee for preparatory advice prior to the hearing and as contribut...
...TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 97 EMPC 51/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN MELISSA BOWEN Plaintiff AND BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M W O’Brien, counsel for plaintiff R M Rendle and M Bolwell, counsel for defendant...
...into the review of references to the Treaty principles in legislation and the proposed Treaty Principles Bill (the urgent inquiry).1 This factsheet includes information on: Who can apply for funding to attend the hearing What type of costs can be funded What the Ministry can book and pay for upfront If you have booked and paid yourself, how to seek reimbursement What is an urgent inquiry? An urgent inquiry is where the Tribunal decides to urgently inquire i...
...DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AK AC 32A/07 19 June 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 32A/07 ARC 35/06 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN TERENCE PAUL GOLDEN Plaintiff AND NORTHLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memorandum received from the defendant on 15 June 2007 Judgment: 19 June 2007 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS...
...WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 200 EMPC 157/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN ACF Plaintiff AND IEN Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Mani, counsel for plaintiff A Hall, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 November 2023 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JU...
...observation made by the Court of Appeal which referred to the Practitioner‟s charges as “excessive”. The Applicant took the view that the Standards Committee was required to take “judicial notice of the Court of Appeal’s finding that the costs claimed were excessive”. This concerned a costs order that had been made by the Court of Appeal against the Applicant who was unsuccessful in two appeal applications against decisions of the High Court. [6] The Court of Appea...
...Auckland Last case event: 21 April 2022 Date of Decision: 16 May 2022 Date of Issue: 16 May 2022 2 _________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO LIABILITY AND APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS AND EXPENSES _________________________________________________________________ A: The First, Second and Third Respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay 70 percent of the costs and expenses sought, being $1,859,356.00....