[2010] NZEmpC 69 Minhinnick v NZ Steel Ltd [pdf, 15 KB]
...superannuation provider. Mr Wicks in his memorandum of behalf of Mr Minhinnick indicates that the sum received by Mr Minhinnick was substantially less than that specified in Mr Skelton’s submissions. In addition, Mr Minhinnick has commitments to a disabled daughter. He and his wife have made substantial borrowings against the equity in their family home in order to modify it to enable them to care for their daughter. Mr Wicks makes the submission that Mr Minhinnick and his wif...