HF v SZ LCRO 186 / 2009 (16 January 2012) - Publication Decision [pdf, 62 KB]
...Complainant’s family. [5] The Practitioner accepted that there had been a want of judgment on his part in this case but disagreed that he posed a risk to the public. He stated that he had not discerned that the client was suffering under a mental disability at the time of their meeting, and that she appeared able to impart instructions, identify her beneficiaries and the property she wished to dispose of, and other related matters. [6] The Complainant’s family also offered...