LCRO 98/2019 EL v SV, DV & JV (31 March 2021) [pdf, 510 KB]
...(e) Both properties – land and dwellings – were in need of reasonably substantial repairs and maintenance. As well, there was livestock on each. As the sole executor and trustee it fell to Mr EL to manage that. (f) Mr OM also had a son with disabilities ([W] OM), who was in care and whose interests in the estate were managed by the Public Trustee. This added an additional layer of bureaucracy and administration. (g) Mrs PE also owned her own home. There was always potential f...