2769 items matching your search terms
CLAIM NO: 00499 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PETER WILLIAM GRAY and SUSAN FRANCES GRAY Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 8 & 9 November 2005 Appearances: Grant Shand for the Claimants No appearance by or on behalf of the First respondent John Bierre and Andrew Wedekind for the Fifth respondent Det
NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PUKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI v COMMISSIONER AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT TE TARI TAAKE NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 164 [21 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 164 EMPC 348/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PUKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI Plaintiff AND
...that is supported by the fact that the directors executed the Bond. That is a legal document, the meaning of which would have been clear to the directors when they signed it. There is no question in this case that they were under any compulsion or disability at the time. That has not been raised in any of the affidavits; 5 • Morningstar had, at all times as the landholder and owner, the power to seek to recover monies from subsequent owners or place covenants for access to the...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND ENV-2016-WLG-000024 Decision No: [2018] NZEnvC 042 of an appeal under clauses 14 and 29(6) of Schedule 1 to the Resource Management Act 1991 THE ARCHITECTURAL CENTRE Appellant WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON Requestor DECISION APPROVING TEXT OF BALANCE OF PLAN CHANGE 81 Decision Issued: 10 APR 2018 [1] I first should apologise to
...Commissioner may take no action on a complaint Agree. Amendment will provide consistency with the Ombudsmen Act 107 Sections 72, 72A and 72B should be combined into a single section providing for the referral of complaints to the Ombudsmen, Health and Disability Commissioner and Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, and consideration should be given to listing other statutory complaints bodies. These sections relate to referring complaints Agree. Implement during drafti...
...(e) Both properties – land and dwellings – were in need of reasonably substantial repairs and maintenance. As well, there was livestock on each. As the sole executor and trustee it fell to Mr EL to manage that. (f) Mr OM also had a son with disabilities ([W] OM), who was in care and whose interests in the estate were managed by the Public Trustee. This added an additional layer of bureaucracy and administration. (g) Mrs PE also owned her own home. There was always potential f...
...The Act has preserved to Māori owners a statutory right to obtain access even although, following a division, adjoining titles may cease to be Māori land. Accordingly the purchasers of such lands acquire not a special advantage but a special disability in that the land could be made the subject of a roadway order even without the purchaser’s consent, if it in fact provides the most suitable access. [66] In Coles v Miller the owners of a farming property at Ngatira sought judic...
...unjustifiably. An incentive not to be an employee? [34] At the time of these events, Mr Kidd was in his early 70s. He was thus entitled to, and did, receive National Superannuation. Mrs Kidd was then aged under 65 but because of a long-term physical disability she was entitled to, and did, receive a state benefit in addition to Mr Kidd’s National Superannuation. There was no evidence, nor were there any submissions, about the effects of income other than his National Superann...
IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2020] NZIACDT 17 Reference No: IACDT 029/18 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN XA Complainant AND JENNIFER ANN HILL Adviser HEARING: 19 & 20 February 2020 SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 10 March 2020
[2018] NZSSAA 42 Reference No. SSAA 03/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX, against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Appearances The Appellant with her agent Ms Carla Woollaston For Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development: Ms J Hume DECISION G Pearson (Chairperson) Backg