Search Results

1. [2024] NZREADT 37 – QT v CAC 2205 & TP (3 October 2024) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...$60,000 less than the original purchase price and was “without extras included” and “as the new base price”.8 4 BoD at 181. 5 BoD at 222. 6 BoD at 270. 7 BoD at 263 and 268. 8 BoD at 269. 4 [13] On 23 September 2022, the appellant emailed the vendor with a list of items to be completed prior to settlement.9 In the email the appellant mentioned that the Control 4 Home System (the Control 4) was not installed. The vendor responded to the appellant as follows:10...

2. OIA-108246.pdf [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 19 December 2023 Our ref: OIA 108246 Tēnā koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Race Relations Commissioner Thank you for your email of 21 November 2023 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specifically, you requested: I noted, https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/statutory-vacancies...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 68 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...copies of the documents to the plaintiff. [7] In respect of the two appendices to the application, the documents to which the application is directed are identical except that Appendix A contains one further document. The documents are all emails or email chains; a briefing document is included in one email. An ‘options’ document is attached to three of the emails. The documents are alleged to have been created in the context of a telephone conference call or calls attend...

4. [2010] NZEmpC 80 Willis v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...occasion as he considered he had been mislead as to the consequences of the warning which he had initially accepted on the basis of what he had been told at the time by Mr Purser as to the policy affecting all employees. [5] There is an email trail which shows repeated requests from the plaintiff after 21 September 2007 for Mr Purser to deal with his concerns and his requests for a formal meeting, Mr Purser replied on 3 October 2007 that he was sorry if the plaintiff fel...

5. Deeming v Whangarei District Council [2015] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...Mr McDowell [19] Mr McDowell gave evidence that prior to receiving the email from Councillor Shelley Deeming he had been telephoned by the Northland Rugby Union and told Mr Deeming had made a complaint to the Union. That complaint had then been emailed to Mr McDowell. Mr McDowell could not now remember which of the two emails he received first. Nor could he remember taking a copy of one or other of the emails with him when he went to see Mr Deeming on 19 August 2009. [20] Mr McDowel...

6. LCRO 96/2017 AA v BB (29 November 2019) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...could be done”, but “[e]qually he was not intending to tell her about the force limit” he had arranged with the firm’s bank, and was “persistently agreeing to a bank cheque settlement”. (b) Mr AA’s 3:15 PM, 3:27 PM, and 3:42 PM emails on 16 January to Ms CC, which evidenced he was “contemplating and confirming availability for a bank cheque settlement”, did not “suggest that his assurances [were] 8 Property Trans...

7. Li v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC), Huang, Chae, Donkin and Barfoot & Thompson Ltd (Mairangi Bay) [2018] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...fully aware of the import of each clause of the Agreement and the fact that it was an unconditional offer which, if accepted, would be binding upon her.2 [6] As part of its findings, the Committee considered that the evidence established that an email exchange with Mrs Li demonstrated that she actually had been provided with an electronic copy of an “information pack” explaining the provisions of Agreement. She was provided with this information on 22 November 2016, before the m...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 17 - SU v Murthy (18 July 2022) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...3 [8] The husband rang Ms Murthy on 2 June 2020 and a meeting with her was arranged for the following day. He sent some documents to her. At the meeting, they discussed future visa options, including residence. [9] Ms Murthy sent an email to the complainant’s husband on 3 June 2020 asking to be advised of their decision, so a contract could be signed. Contract signed to assist with residence [10] There was a gap of three months before the husband contacted Ms Murthy...

9. LCRO 138/2023 FK v LM (12 June 2025) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...not met her obligations under that regime. [13] Those matters aside, the applicant’s complaint was essentially that the respondent: (a) was discourteous to him in avoiding and not returning his calls and not acknowledging or replying to his emails; (b) failed to promote and maintain professional standards generally, summarised as: (i) being overly litigious; (ii) behaving in an inflammatory manner; (iii) refusing to accept service of “divorce” proceedings; (c) through...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 05 - UT v Lawlor (18 January 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...partner had paid a total of $4,630 by 14 February 2022. [7] Mr Lawlor lodged the visa application with Immigration NZ on 29 April 2022. It was on behalf of the partner (the principal applicant) and the complainant. [8] The complainant sent an email to Mr Lawlor on 20 June 2022 asking if there was any way they could check the status of the application themselves, without bothering him. He replied on the same day saying, “Yes” and would let her know. He did not subsequent...